Make Sure You Take A Second Look

Thomas J.

Chumono
Messages
595
Reaction score
1,444
Location
DFW area
USDA Zone
7
Don't always go by what seems to be the obvious, there might be something better if you give it a second look. Here's two junipers i did exactly that with and made nice little cascades out of them. The first pic shows the obvious cascade, but i didn't go with that , instead I seen something better by giving it a second look as you can see in the second pic. By using the least obvious only because something else came to my eye, I now with a little patience and three yrs later, have a nice little cascade in the procumbens juniper. pic2.jpg pic3.jpg jun41.jpg pic3.jpg jun41.jpg
 

Thomas J.

Chumono
Messages
595
Reaction score
1,444
Location
DFW area
USDA Zone
7
I'm not sure why the above post doubled up on the pics and I don't see a way to delete them. Anyway here's tree #2, again a second look to make sure I was going to pick the correct end and go with it. And again after three yrs and a nice little Tokaname pot that cost ten times more than the tree, I now have a nice cascade. :)pic 11.jpg pic 4.jpg jun21.jpg
 

aml1014

Masterpiece
Messages
3,667
Reaction score
5,807
Location
Albuquerque new mexico
USDA Zone
7b
Tokaname pot that cost ten times more than the tree
Love how that's the case 90% of the time!
Great trees, This could be a good progression for begginers with young stock!

Aaron
EDIT: I just realized I hit over 2000 posts, I hope I don't turn into @sorce lol
 

barrosinc

Masterpiece
Messages
4,127
Reaction score
4,691
Location
Santiago, Chile
USDA Zone
9b
Don't always go by what seems to be the obvious, there might be something better if you give it a second look. Here's two junipers i did exactly that with and made nice little cascades out of them. The first pic shows the obvious cascade, but i didn't go with that , instead I seen something better by giving it a second look as you can see in the second pic. By using the least obvious only because something else came to my eye, I now with a little patience and three yrs later, have a nice little cascade in the procumbens juniper.
I don't get it. You say it shows an obvious cascade and you did something different and ended up with a cascade?
 

Thomas J.

Chumono
Messages
595
Reaction score
1,444
Location
DFW area
USDA Zone
7
No No, I didn't use the whip on the right hanging down like most people especially beginners would do. I started over by using the less obvious one. :)
 

ColinFraser

Masterpiece
Messages
2,370
Reaction score
5,700
Location
Central Coast, California
USDA Zone
9b
Fun stuff. Do you have any current pictures of them cleaned up where we could see the trunk, movement, etc.? Beginners would probably also like to see how much trunk growth they can expect in 3 years . . .
 

Thomas J.

Chumono
Messages
595
Reaction score
1,444
Location
DFW area
USDA Zone
7
Do you have any current pictures of them

Actually the last pic in each set of three is the current pic. You won't get much trunk growth if any once you confine the tree to a small pot. Here's one that I started in 1998 from the first pic. I did nothing with it until 2002 which is the second pic. third pic is around 2004 or so, and the last pic is today. Notice after 18yrs how little the trunk grew in girth. What you will get though is a trunk that's starting to look aged after about 5yrs meaning no shiny bark but a nice dull looking and crusty looking in some casespic 1.jpg pic 2.jpg pic 3.jpg jun71.jpg
 

ColinFraser

Masterpiece
Messages
2,370
Reaction score
5,700
Location
Central Coast, California
USDA Zone
9b
You won't get much trunk growth if any once you confine the tree to a small pot.
That was kind of my point - I just thought it might be nice for newer people interested in working procumbens nursery stock to see, but the trunk (and branching for that matter) is almost completely invisible in those current pictures.
 

RickMartin

Omono
Messages
1,111
Reaction score
618
Location
Joplin, Mo.
USDA Zone
6b
Actually the last pic in each set of three is the current pic. You won't get much trunk growth if any once you confine the tree to a small pot. Here's one that I started in 1998 from the first pic. I did nothing with it until 2002 which is the second pic. third pic is around 2004 or so, and the last pic is today. Notice after 18yrs how little the trunk grew in girth. What you will get though is a trunk that's starting to look aged after about 5yrs meaning no shiny bark but a nice dull looking and crusty looking in some casesView attachment 115172 View attachment 115173 View attachment 115174 View attachment 115175
Nice point made here. You could have easily used that whip in the first pic as your cascading branch, but you didnt. You grew another one, and made the tree better IMO. I agree it would be nice to see more trunk and branches, but im not sure its possible at this time. Maybe remove a tuft here, another there, just might open it up some. I wouldnt go scissor happy on them though.

Rick
 

LeonardB

Shohin
Messages
367
Reaction score
316
Thomas J,
I was starting the same type of design idea last season. Found an outstanding piece of deadwood that inspired and I think changed the whole presentation.
Even though it is now a tanuki, I think after putting in the main bend it looks to show an outstanding cascade potential ( to the right ).
It may be the show piece I have been looking for. Any suggestions? Sorce?
Regards,
Leonard
 

Attachments

  • 10-27-16 Driftwood B (2).jpg
    10-27-16 Driftwood B (2).jpg
    366.1 KB · Views: 56
  • Tanuki - 2016-05.jpg
    Tanuki - 2016-05.jpg
    282.1 KB · Views: 59
  • Tanuki - 2016-04.jpg
    Tanuki - 2016-04.jpg
    368.6 KB · Views: 60
Top Bottom