M. Frary
Bonsai Godzilla
At one time. Ropes hold water a long time.But shouldn't that also mean it was wet [ of the rope ]
At one time. Ropes hold water a long time.But shouldn't that also mean it was wet [ of the rope ]
Trump said himself that the election was rigged and he would protest a loss.I agree with everything you said. Just saw on the news there are 7 cities protesting the results. So if Clinton wins everything is great but if Trump wins we have a broken system. I don't remember any protesting win Obama won but I could be wrong. Not a Trump fan but I'm hoping for best.
If trump can institute the tax plan he proposed in September. Then he will lower the taxes on the wealthiest Americans by 7%. Raise the taxes on the poorest by 2% and keep it the same for the middle class. Trump IS the status quo. He is not for the middle class. He fooled so many people.Congratulations on your new president. I hope he will work for all you Americans, how he claims and you ALL will consider your country great again. What I like...his different look at Putin, it can improve many things. I hate those superpowers games.
But what I'm afraid of is...the rich will get richer and the poor poorer. I hope for you I'm not right.
The great War on drugs that Reagan began.
They're losing bad but won't admit it.
No wall will stop it.
Prisons are full of minor drug offenders but cops that kill unarmed people still walk.
I think old Ronnie had stock in razor wire.
And then the Bush.
His war on terrorism is going very well too.
Trillions down the tube shortly after he came into power.
He has stock in bullets I think.
Wonder what Trump will declare war on?
Probably those pesky spray tan manufacturers that turned him orange.[/QUOTE
Exactly Obama inherited a false war that bush created on lies and somehow Obama started it?
So his chief strategist is a unapologetic Racist who is also a former Goldman sacs executive.He didn't say "the world". He said the Republican Party "has become the most dangerous organization in world history". More dangerous than the Nazis. More dangerous than the Khmer Rouge. More dangerous than the Soviets in pre-WWII USSR. But his point was that Republicans are going to destroy the entire world because they may adopt a position that doesn't address global warming. Hyperbole aside, I agree with the position that global warming is a critical problem that needs to be addressed GLOBALLY. The United States represents 16% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Let us hope we continue to reduce our output, as we have for the last 12 years (yes - even when evil Republicans have been in the political majority). In the meantime, perhaps people might want to look at the other 84% of the problem - whose production of greenhouse gasses is INCREASING.
I haven't labeled him, he has labeled himself. I'm not sure how you want me to respond to this. Am I not supposed to know that the guy espouses anarchic/socialistic ideals? He has a very specific view of the role of government that is at odds with what the American People have voted for the role of government to be. Are we not a democracy? Or does his single opinion as a "public intellectual" trump the opinions of 120 million voters? To play devil's advocate, what if he came out as an extreme White Supremicist, and then wrote an article how he was concerned about President Obama getting elected. Am I not supposed to take his public political position into account when I evaluate his suggestions?
Here I have lost you. Have YOU even read his article? He specifically talks about the reasons why Trump "broke all records in the support he received from white voters, working class and lower middle class, particularly in the $50,000 to $90,000 income range, rural and suburban, primarily those without college education." Trump ran on a platform CONTRARY to multi-nationalism, and wants to limit off-shoring, renegotiate international trade deals, and institute tariffs - the very opposite of what you seem to be suggesting is his position.
Politics in the US is a messy business, but the end result is usually much more moderate than what either party "warns" is about to happen. They like to play to their extreme constituents because that is how they get media air time and garner the most political contributions. It gets really sickening when you see BOTH party candidates pandering to Wall Street. But I highly recommend you turn off the pundits and the commentators and the editorialists, and watch to see what actually HAPPENS before you draw conclusions.
By the way, you're welcome for the help we just provided Australia with your illegal immigration problem. The US has a challenge with illegal immigration as well, but that doesn't stop us from reaching out to help our Australian friends. When we aren't busy sucking the world dry, that is![]()
@Maloghurst Um-mm the idea was of if there was an issue with voting...the ballots and such. And...THERE WERE! But...he still won. Imagine that. There was a lot of issues...two stacks of ballots sent to one address...all having different names on them. What was that about!?! Illegals voting as well...and so fourth. We had less booths in our voting station. Assuming because many were requesting paper ballots...over voting machines that were needing calibrated. We've switched back to paper a long while back.Trump said himself that the election was rigged and he would protest a loss.
I am no longer following anything written that says anything regarding Trump's agendas. When I hear him speak live on such topics...THEN I WILL BELIEVE IT. So much false stuff floating about...that I don't believe anything any longer. Sorry. We've discussed media bias a long time ago...and I see them still trying to create a division. But that is my take...take things how you wish...Just scroll to the bottom and you can see his proposed tax plan.
http://www.npr.org/2016/11/13/50173...ampaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=2040
That's why I said scroll to the bottom.I am no longer following anything written that says anything regarding Trump's agendas. When I hear him speak live on such topics...THEN I WILL BELIEVE IT. So much false stuff floating about...that I don't believe anything any longer. Sorry. We've discussed media bias a long time ago...and I see them still trying to create a division. But that is my take...take things how you wish...
So you feel...since no quote...it's an authentic piece of documentation. I'm more skeptical...sorry. When I google the Tax Policy Center...it's came up with a few BIAS complaints. If it were a GOVERNMENT site...I may take it with more of a grain of salt. It is not...So, no...I don't claim to think it as taking it to the bank with it's information. Sorry...that's my take.That's why I said scroll to the bottom.
There are no quotes, or any talking. Just his proposed tax plan.
It shows the current plan directly next to his proposed plan. Nothing false.
Be knowledgeable.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ryanell...analysis-of-marco-rubio-tax-cut/#7b2f9a827685Tax Policy Center Releases Flawed And Biased Analysis Of Marco Rubio Tax Cut
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/3...ases-dynamic-analyses-of-candidates-tax-plansAt an event last week, Trump adviser Peter Navarro criticized TPC for not including analyses of the other parts of Trump’s economic plan. He also accused TPC of liberal bias.
Indeed. Here in New Zealand to![]()
I do.target the white supremacist groups?
Russia is the big one.there is more than one country in the world that is more than happy to see the States in so much turmoil
At least I can tell from your response that you do not agree with his proposed, unfair tax plan.So you feel...since no quote...it's an authentic piece of documentation. I'm more skeptical...sorry. When I google the Tax Policy Center...it's came up with a few BIAS complaints. If it were a GOVERNMENT site...I may take it with more of a grain of salt. It is not...So, no...I don't claim to think it as taking it to the bank with it's information. Sorry...that's my take.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ryanell...analysis-of-marco-rubio-tax-cut/#7b2f9a827685
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/3...ases-dynamic-analyses-of-candidates-tax-plans
Actually after doing a Google search...I'm even more determined not to take what is in their article as news worthy. Sorry...that's my take. Free country...you're welcome to your own out take though.
* If not all of his economic plan was equated into the factor...how is that an accurate report?
Never believe any politician. No matter who.believe someone like Donald trump on his word?
I did not read the proposed plan...when it's stated it's not all in it's entirety. And I do check sites on Google for credibility prior to offering my time reading their text. I'm not here to play a game of play on words. I stated...why I refuse to go with what this site shared.At least I can tell from your response that you do not agree with his proposed, unfair tax plan.
But there is really nothing to lie about, it's the same as every republican before him. Cut taxes on the wealthy and raise on the poorest. What do you think he could possibly want to do differently?
How is it that as such a skeptical person you would believe someone like Donald trump on his word?
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/policies/tax-planSo you feel...since no quote...it's an authentic piece of documentation. I'm more skeptical...sorry. When I google the Tax Policy Center...it's came up with a few BIAS complaints. If it were a GOVERNMENT site...I may take it with more of a grain of salt. It is not...So, no...I don't claim to think it as taking it to the bank with it's information. Sorry...that's my take.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ryanell...analysis-of-marco-rubio-tax-cut/#7b2f9a827685
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/3...ases-dynamic-analyses-of-candidates-tax-plans
Actually after doing a Google search...I'm even more determined not to take what is in their article as news worthy. Sorry...that's my take. Free country...you're welcome to your own out take though.
* If not all of his economic plan was equated into the factor...how is that an accurate report?
I'm looking into those. I want to be like Don and not pay any so I can safely say I'm smarter than everyone else.loopholes
As a small business owner...that MAKES me happy!https://www.donaldjtrump.com/policies/tax-plan
Is this better? Would you believe Donald trumps website?
Just own that you support this kind of BS tax plan.
the current plan is fact. The wealthiest Americans pay 40% before the deductions and loopholes etc.
The poorest pay 10%. Middle pay 28%.
His plan is wealthiest pay 33%. The middle still pays 28% and poorest pay 12%.
He also wants to lower business taxes, small and large from 32% to 15%.
Please tell me that you believe trumps own website?
Less than $75,000: 12%
More than $75,000 but less than $225,000: 25%
More than $225,000: 33%
But it doesn't make the poorer tax payers happy.As a small business owner...that MAKES me happy!
What...your's went up...2% ...that sucks. It's a very fine margin...but it sucks...taxes suck. I'm not sure how all our taxes break down honestly...We have the business and our accountant handles that aspect. Personally...I don't bring home middle class when said and done...so I maybe in the same bracket as you. I am hoping the taxes we pay for being self employed balances things. But...even if not...It is what it is...and it's not going to change. I'm not going to gripe over it,for it wont bring change...and I'm not one for allowing things I can't control to eat my lunch...I will pay my taxes...and face each day as I did before.But it doesn't make the poorer tax payers happy.
Which is the tax bracket I'm in.
I'm so used to being screwed by the government you could throw a brick up my ass and not hit the sides.
And that's why I can't hit the high notes on the Stars Spangled Banana.