At the end of the video, she contradicts herself and says, "yes, of course it works, because it does indeed add Cationic-exchange-capacity (CEC), to let's say sandy soils"
...then also says at the end of the video, the reason for her really disliking/unbelieving in it is because "it's unethical" (because mined) and isn't truly 100% organic, companies lie it's organic and it is prowcessed and made in a lab like chemical ferts.
Unethical ≠ that it doesn't work or isn't effective
Unethical = personal/political views on mining coal, renewable materials, company integrity, etc.
Not 100% organic and is processed ≠ same, that it doesn't work or isn't effective
...so her argument and points are a bit misleading and tries to confuse the audience. She sounds more about ethics and political views, rather than how it works.
I see her point in it being mined, comes from coal, and is processed in a lab. But, "organic" can also mean that at one point in time (albeit far back in time) it was once a living thing... and carbon and coal was once living thousands of years ago.
Iirc, some products and ferts that have a lot of humic-acids in them never even state "Organic" on their labels anyways, and even state in their FAQ that their products aren't organic. eg: Gro Power products.
But, The Andersons brand def do state "Organic" in their listings.