Japanese White pine #2

Adair M

Pinus Envy
Messages
14,402
Reaction score
34,898
Location
NEGeorgia
USDA Zone
7a
yes when I can I certainly will
Thanks all for the feedback, it is appreciated!
It's a really nice JWP, Judy! And pictures never are able to covey the depth of the tree effectively. The only way to really experience the tree is to have it in front of you.

Be safe in the ice!
 

JudyB

Queen of the Nuts
Messages
13,795
Reaction score
23,350
Location
South East of Cols. OH
USDA Zone
6a
Made it to work, only had to spend an hour with the salt/ash combo on the curve down from my house. Crampons are essential gear here sometimes. Even with a Subaru, getting down can be tricky! Back up is never a problem...
 

JudyB

Queen of the Nuts
Messages
13,795
Reaction score
23,350
Location
South East of Cols. OH
USDA Zone
6a
Here are some other angles of this tree, it's hard to see the trunk flow a bit under the needle clusters, but you can see that the apex moves quite strongly toward the front. I am going to try out some angles this spring, tipping to the right and forward a bit I think. The topmost branch of the apex has a lot of growing to do to finish the image of the apex coming back to the right...
P1020092.jpg P1020094.jpg P1020095.jpg P1020096.jpg P1020097.jpg
 

petegreg

Masterpiece
Messages
2,781
Reaction score
4,079
Location
Slovakia
USDA Zone
6a
Now we can see how beautiful this tree is. Have you considered pictures No 1 and 2 as a front?
 

JudyB

Queen of the Nuts
Messages
13,795
Reaction score
23,350
Location
South East of Cols. OH
USDA Zone
6a
Now we can see how beautiful this tree is. Have you considered pictures No 1 and 2 as a front?
Picture 2 is the back of the tree, the apex moves far too much toward the other side I think. The bark plating is also not as natural looking on the back of the trunk. I Would have to change the entire structure of the branching to make the side (#1 Pic) an option. But I see what you're seeing there.
 

0soyoung

Imperial Masterpiece
Messages
7,500
Reaction score
12,874
Location
Anacortes, WA (AHS heat zone 1)
USDA Zone
8b
I think you've chosen the best front, @JudyB, because it best shows your tree's excellent bark! As you well, know that makes for some styling challenges! What fun!

Oooo, the pleasures of bonsai voyeurism :D.
 

petegreg

Masterpiece
Messages
2,781
Reaction score
4,079
Location
Slovakia
USDA Zone
6a
Picture 2 is the back of the tree, the apex moves far too much toward the other side I think. The bark plating is also not as natural looking on the back of the trunk. I Would have to change the entire structure of the branching to make the side (#1 Pic) an option. But I see what you're seeing there.
Well, I know, but if you knew how many trees after styling look better from the back...
From the first picture (left side view), bigger part of the tree moves to the back. From the other side view it's 50:50.
Looking at your present front, some adjustment on the top could help. But there's an empty and open space I think you want to keep. And the wood of this size can be rigid enough.
Here's a picture to show what I mean...pushing the circled branch and top down, more towards the viewer.
downloadfile.jpg
 

JudyB

Queen of the Nuts
Messages
13,795
Reaction score
23,350
Location
South East of Cols. OH
USDA Zone
6a
Well, I know, but if you knew how many trees after styling look better from the back...
Oh, but I do... I've turned many a tree that I've worked from one side for years to the other side ;) BUT the bark is too much better from the current front to do this or I'd be tempted. I've long admired the trunkline from the back on this tree.
Take another look at this photo from the actual angle currently, the branch you are circling is in actuality more down and towards, than this angled shot shows.
I do appreciate the feedback!
P1020088.jpg
 

Potawatomi13

Imperial Masterpiece
Messages
6,173
Reaction score
4,404
Location
Eugene, OR
USDA Zone
8
There is nice tree here altogether. However first front seems two different trees: one is trunk, one is foliage that do not seem a good combo at this angle. I also see tree going away. Either end view trunk looks better and bigger. Perhaps because head of tree appears smaller. Like this more natural irregularity of foliage. Also somewhat better for quarter view but can also see trunk is going away from you as if windswept or leaning over cliff. Without doubt you will get this all worked out;). Will be interesting to see.
 

JudyB

Queen of the Nuts
Messages
13,795
Reaction score
23,350
Location
South East of Cols. OH
USDA Zone
6a
Some of what you see is not apparent in person, but we will see what a new angle can do for the issues that everyone is seeing with this tree. Thanks!
 

Adair M

Pinus Envy
Messages
14,402
Reaction score
34,898
Location
NEGeorgia
USDA Zone
7a
Alas... this is an example of the problem with "pigeon breast" trees. It's not that the trunk is unattractive, the "pigeon breast", it's what the stance does to the whole balance of the tree.

First, think about how a pigeon looks: his chest is somewhat puffed out, but his head is held back. They don't always have that posture, but this is the posture that gives rise to the name;

IMG_0627.JPG

IMG_0628.JPG

IMG_0625.JPG

So, what we have, is the breast of the pigeon is further in front than the head.

Now, look at the first picture in post 303. The lower trunk is closer to the viewer than the highest bit of foliage. It doesn't matter if the branch the highest foliage is growing towards the viewer, it's where it IS that matters. Looking at that first picture, we can see that the highest foliage is either directly above the center of the nebari or is behind the base of the trunk.

In any event, it is well behind the front of the trunk.

The third picture in post 303 shows the highest bit of foliage to be more forward. But is that really the apex? Or a frontal branch? This is why it's really hard to style a tree based upon photos. So much depends upon the viewing angle.

My suggestion is to tilt the tree towards the viewer, bringing the apex in front of the trunk. The back branches would then need to be wired down.

Another option is to use the other side of the tree as the front.
 

JudyB

Queen of the Nuts
Messages
13,795
Reaction score
23,350
Location
South East of Cols. OH
USDA Zone
6a
Thank you so much for posting these lovely images of birds. I am glad you did, as I've never seen one before! (sarcasm, just in case you missed it...)
Another option is to use the other side of the tree as the front
And then we would be back to the horror of the apex moving away...
As I've said several times now, I will try out new angles to see if I can overcome the trunk issues. If not, I suppose I'll just toss it on the woodpile!
But is that really the apex?
It will be. I've said that I'm in the process of lengthening this branch to be the apex. Besides, by the meaning of the word, the topmost branch IS the apex, regardless of it's orientation.
Thanks for taking the time to post Adair.
 

0soyoung

Imperial Masterpiece
Messages
7,500
Reaction score
12,874
Location
Anacortes, WA (AHS heat zone 1)
USDA Zone
8b
Alas... this is an example of the problem with "pigeon breast" trees. It's not that the trunk is unattractive, the "pigeon breast", it's what the stance does to the whole balance of the tree.
I don't see pidgeon breasts in @JudyB's tree

jbJWPlike.jpg

Let her extend her right arm a bit ...
 

JudyB

Queen of the Nuts
Messages
13,795
Reaction score
23,350
Location
South East of Cols. OH
USDA Zone
6a
Wow, what a beautiful tree!
I haven't seen this one before!
That's just a straight JWP, right?
No graft....?
This is a graft, it's just a good one. That's why I picked this tree, the bark and the graft are so good, that the faults are a bit easier to overlook. Not that I'm done, I'll work on the booty curve by angling the planting next season.
Thanks JWI.
 

just.wing.it

Deadwood Head
Messages
12,141
Reaction score
17,549
Location
Just South of the Mason Dixon
USDA Zone
6B
This is a graft, it's just a good one. That's why I picked this tree, the bark and the graft are so good, that the faults are a bit easier to overlook. Not that I'm done, I'll work on the booty curve by angling the planting next season.
Thanks JWI.
Dang! Fooled me good!
 

Andrew Robson

Shohin
Messages
462
Reaction score
802
Location
Portland, OR
Alas... this is an example of the problem with "pigeon breast" trees.

Pigeon breast trees are really not a problem like we make them out to be. Many fantastic trees have them. It's really a myth that we have seemed to have made up in America, like many things in bonsai. Not unlike bar branches. People who preach the blasphemy of bar branches tend to have trees that are far too thin...
 
Messages
1,654
Reaction score
2,536
Location
Belgium
I always find it difficult to comment on a tree with this qualities. I find it a fantastic tree and she is happy. You have made the choice to lean the tree more to the left, it gives the tree a more massive feeling and it accentuates the rootbase. Somehow i like the 2012 image more. It's more feminine (and i'm a man), the angle of the dropping branch is better. And with the current pictures the top portion of the tree is very vertical and makes this a very static tree. It might be that there is a better front somewhere accentuating the dropping branch and the empty area below it. For sure you will lose some other benifits and i am just looking at a photo so keep that in mind. I might come to the same conclusion when i have the tree in my hands or not. I'm looking forward to the evolution. Thanks for sharing this journey with us!
 

JudyB

Queen of the Nuts
Messages
13,795
Reaction score
23,350
Location
South East of Cols. OH
USDA Zone
6a
I have always wondered why yamadori gets a pass for each and every flaw that they have, and yet grown trees must conform. Just an observation...

@dirk hoorelbeke I am always looking to better my trees, and conifers are not really my strong suit, so I'm actually pretty happy to receive critique and suggestions. We will see what happens at the repot!
 
Top Bottom