GGB
Masterpiece
Scots are treated the same as mugo?! sweet, I love having less to remember
Vance,
It's hard to tell how successful you can be at reselling this kind of material. It has been my experience that most people you are going to run into don't fully understand or appreciate the material in the way you do. They cannot see what you see, it's not their fault but it is none the less a fact. A year ago I brought all of the huge trunked Mugos to our clubs sale and auction, and did not sell one of them. Now I am getting people asking if I had any of them left? Of course that's after I have done some of the elimination.Wow, @Vance Wood! Do you get a good rate of return or is this just enough for you to fund a bonsai habit? I've considered attempts at a two-year turnaround for selling raw nursery stock mugos that have been given initial bonsai work.
To be honest about the Shimpakus; I am not a real fan of Tanuki grafts. Bring them in Sunday and we will talk about it. As to the Mugos; when you get trunks as large as these you are not really developing a trunk, you already have one, you are developing the branching and design to show it off. It is this point or pit fall that many trip over or fall into, lacking the ability or not being able to understand, if they have material that needs to be developed, as in being grown out, or designed, as in eliminating all but crucial elements. These Mugos are for the most part in the elimination process where less is more.
Artists that have material in these two differing points of development have to determine which they have. Are they trying to grow something up into a mold that for the most part exists in their mind only, or they trying to cut something down, from existing material, to resemble an image that exists in their mind that can be created from what exists at present.
Vance,An interesting thing about all of this I have discovered over the years; people will moan and grown about raw material like these Mugos are as having no potential but at the same time will spend a boat load of money for a collected tree that costs about as much as a small car and has just about as much potential. They will drool allover one of these trees and have about as much vision for it as the Mugo they rejected. I don't fault anyone for this either but it does show me that one of the biggest problems is not the material but the perception of the material.
Mike,If you still have the second one I'll buy it.
I should have gotten it from you when it was sitting in front of me last year.
You get it if you want it Leonard. It's nice. He had it there last show but I got a Scots from him.Mike,
Shame on you for trying to buy this out from under me ( before I can get Vance to approve or debunk my development theories).
Truthfully, I think either one of these is sooooo far over my head. Maybe I should just tackle learning how to keep mugo's healthy ( and alive )? But seeing material like this with all the potential is fascinating ( but no evidence of droolin yet, lol ).
Were you going to try and take some photo's for me of potential collectables before we talk about a field trip next month?
Regards,
Leonard
Mike,You get it if you want it Leonard. It's nice. He had it there last show but I got a Scots from him.
It's all yours buddy. I wouldn't pull the rug out from under you.
Thanks VanceI hope it is alive but bring it with you I would very much like to take a look and see if I can figure out what may have gong wrong with it.
I think maybe you are right but as you know finding good trees at a nursery is not easy. The main reason I prefer collected is not contorted shapes of trunks but the age and bark. Good nursery trees are still grown as fast as possible while "good" collected trees may put on a cm of growth in 2 years. They tend to display more age and I really like that. Im not disagreeing with you though I think people can get biased and maybe I am too. Mugo tends to have nice bark early but things like Larch from nursery stock just look so young to me even with a 6'' trunk.the biggest problems is not the material but the perception of the material