Chamaecypris pisifera “Boulevard”

sorce said:

Cypress aren't supposed to backbud right?

Even if they do....I think them first branches wont work in a design.

But dont take em off.
I'd cut them little trunks low branches back to the first forks to see if they bud closer. Just as a test.
Keep them on to smooth out the trunk some....

But eventually....this close growth up here is where my tree would be.View attachment 172913

Maybe a slight angle change....real slight...
Some subtle movement in the big trunk....real subtle
And a little attention and clean up to where they split. Just to allow good eye flow right up into the canopies.

Using what it offers fast....with a shot of creativity.
Sure the split is high....but the trunk sizes and heights are perfect. And I dont mind high splits.

Sorce

Click to expand...

KiwiPlantGuy said:

Hi Sorce,
Thank you for your analysis and comments. You are correct that these don’t backbud very well ( or not at all).
So I now definitely see the bottom 2 left branches being a problem and I will address them.
Probably won’t quite take as much off as your virtual and go with @petegreg thoughts.
Charles

Click to expand...

petegreg said:

Charles, and you can also let both trunks growing (kind of sacrifice growth, when you clean lower branches of the top not to shade the new top) and form a new tops. It will help thicken the trunks, slowly with potted junipers, but I can see some thickening on my little trees and also will help create some taper.

Click to expand...

KiwiPlantGuy said:

correcting branch flaws

Click to expand...

sorce said:

Like all them flawed low ones!

Quite honestly, just because these "don't backbud" doesnt mean yours won't. Typically these trees have been heavily shaded on the interior, your branches have been exposed to sun so maybe you get closer buds.

I would still treat them low branches as tests for your keeper top. Even if you do end up keeping them, or ESPECIALLY if you end up keeping them, you'll need to cut em back to the first fork anyway.

The top should be drawing enough sap up to keep those branches viable no matter how much you cut off, (where are dem cypress pros?) so I'd go for it and wire them out.

Most important!
Please understand I'm not saying cut them branches off now. By all means leave them on for now.....

But....
This tree certainly reached this "inevitable scenario" same as JWI's tree.....https://bonsainut.com/posts/519368/

My opinion on The rules.....

Following the rules creates believable trees.
90% of the rules must be followed before one can hide a rule breaker within the beauty of the tree created by the rules.

3 strikes With these low branches.
No close foliage. (Plus 90% no backbuds)
Improper spacing/sizing.
Out of proportion with the trunk.

Fucked up thing is any of that could be hidden with a few closer branches.
But we, and especially YOU, with way more hort skills than I, can't go wasting time on something we already know is not likely to happen.
Where even if it does, we still have other flaws in them branches.

I'm ranting, forgive me. I want you to see that tree up there.

I always like to put an imaginary person with the tree, in order to gauge proportion, perspective.

This tree as is, and unfortunately, with what we know about it backbudding, for the long foreseen future, has me seeing a man this big.
View attachment 172940

That's @fredman , picking on him cuz he dont come play anymore! Lol!

This tree that I want you to see up there....
I cant make a good damn virtual, but if you can imagine a branching up yonder, which as far as I can see is NOTHING SHORT OF PERFECT. (first branch emerges from the small trunk, close foliage, proportionate or close enough, differing planes in all 3d directions) like this here Mach5 branching from an RMJ...View attachment 172941

If you pop that apex on your tree up there....

DAMN!

That sexy, lean, subtle moving run up...
With that canopy and apex you Have ALL THE RIGHT STUFF GOING ON TO MAKE PERFECT!

Man becomes this big.View attachment 172942

Or smaller! Yes thats still fredman!

In a small round drum or imperfect literate pot, or on a long thin slab depending on what the roots allow....

That's a pimp ass tree!

Its not only those low branches suck that says you should cut them, but the fact that everything you have going on up at the top is SO DAMN PERFECT!

At that point the only flaw or broken rule is that of the high split....and IMO...that's one of the stupidest rules there is! I think it has more to do with splits being ugly most of the time, U shaped or bulging, I think thats why the Japanese tend to keep splits at the soil line. 99% of the time it is more visually pleasing.

But your split, with a little cleanup, is nice. The trunks remain so nicely different sized as they run up....if you get the big trunk to move a little more in conjuncion with the small one....that should be the Feature on this tree.

Its not everyday you see two trunks so nicely different sized and flawless enough to make that run all the way up to that what will be very high apex....

But these trunks pull it off!
And you have Perfectness in those top branches to make a beautiful canopy.

Shit. I convinced myself of it enough to fall back on this @crust advice.
Don't cut them low branches at all!
Keep all this foliage to push roots with as severe a repot as them lost cypress pros suggest.
Leave em till this recovers....
And follow them cypress pros advice on how to keep that sexy apex from getting out of hand.

I wish someone would make that good virt.
But hell...
Even my child virts can be better than a good virtual using those low branches....
Even the best virt isnt going to make those low branches into a good tree!

See that thing Charles!
Your thumb is too green to be Green in Bonsai!

Sorce

Click to expand...

KiwiPlantGuy said:

Whew, you ok Sorce? I am tired from the reading lol.
Now to digest the book of wisdom and make this tree even better
Charles

Click to expand...

sorce said:

Hehehe!

Something about understanding how these crusty (different crust) old vets get the way they are....

I hope I chose words and stroked your ego enough to help you move forward.

Sucks for me cuz it seems pretend, to stroke an ego, cuz I really dont feel you need it, but how to be nice? And not condescending?
(I usually reserve Ego Stroking for the Police so I don't get ticketed ....or shot!)

It's always easier when speaking with someone outside the states.
(We tend to cry and know it all already)

Its got a lot to do with the fact that finally, six years in, I found the key to horticultural success for me.

You got that part down, except for that thing we talked about back when, the utilizing it for bonsai purposes part...
Which as we see here....even I forgot about till I remembered you need that foliage to charge your repot!

But that's what this chatting does!
Exposes!
(So long as young American Panties arent getting bunched!)

This is what I mean By.....

"Ask all the questions till the answers start to reveal themselves"

What really needs to be done won't present itself until all the BS is sorted through.

Anyway.

Makes me wish more peiple were here commenting on this thread!

Did they forget SoHem is providing the action this time of year!?

I really love this material.
One of a kind offerings.

Sorce

Click to expand...

Adair M said:

Can you take some more pictures? This time, get the camera taking the picture down so that it’s about level with the rim of the pot. It’s hard to really see what’s going on from a picture taken too high.

The problem(s) I see are: the split trunk looks like a slingshot. There’s not enough size difference down at the split to give a “mother/daughter” look. Plus, from the angle shown, the smaller trunk moves back towards the main trunk. Then moves away again.

The small trunk has this crossing branch that starts on the inside, then crosses over and goes left. And unfortunately, it’s at the same height as the branches on the other trunk!

Then, above that crossing branch, the small trunk doesn’t have any more branches for a long stretch.

Here’s what I would consider doing:

Try to make the Y wider. Specifically, move the small trunk so it’s growing more away from the tall one. See if the “crossing branch” can be turned up to become the new trunk line of the small tree. This would shorten it, give better taper, and the internodes will be shorter.

On the right, the first right branch kinda goes towards the back, and the second branch on the right comes more forward. And the second branch appears to be heavier ( may just be the wire making it look bigger). I would remove or Jin the lowest right branch.

I would keep the lowest left branch on the small trunk.

Click to expand...

KiwiPlantGuy said:

Hi Adair M,
Thank you for taking the time to drop in on my thread and for your critique.
I will attempt better photos toMorrow as raining and all now
Charles

Click to expand...

Adair M said:

That’s better than here! It’s freezing cold!

Click to expand...

Adair M said:

That’s better than here! It’s freezing cold!

Click to expand...

Shima said:

Yep...they don't back bud. You've taken on a difficult tree to work with. Which is why we don't see many of them. It will be interesting to play with but...wish I could be less dark about it.

Click to expand...

KiwiPlantGuy said:

Maybe I start again with this one lol?

Click to expand...