Bonsai Nut
Nuttier than your average Nut
Should I put a wiki up on the site for us to collectively build over time?
Only if the Wiki has really good moderators. As others have said, the internet is the 21st century equivalent of the 19th-century American West. We need a couple of good "federal marshals" to keep order, review entries for accuracy, and edit or redact as needed.Should I put a wiki up on the site for us to collectively build over time?
It would make everyone here that participates at B-NUT a moderator for being able to cast their vote for what they think is more accurate ???
to tell the truth BNut ... it's probably more trouble than it is worth.... stacey allen muse stated its one big argument waiting to happen... bonsai is in soo many ways subjective...
take something as simple as the use of copper or aluminum wire .... many people would say never use aluminum on pines and I and many others would not condemn it (including my teacher who uses aluminum for everything) ... so who is right? some japanese teachers will teach to use it some of the time and not other times...
take the styling of trees as well.. all very subjective with many differing opinions across the world of bonsai...
anyways I hope you this makes sense... good idea .... doesn't work out as well in practice...
It's an interesting idea. Normally in a wiki you ask for people to post the sources of their information. For example you wouldn't just say "black pines are difficult" but rather "because of the nature of their care, black pines are not considered beginner bonsai (1)" and then your source would be footnoted (and hopefully a good source). In a case where there is some controversy you would post both points of view and footnote both.
I understand and agree... but what does one do when there is no actual sources to be footnoted ??? or as been stated before on another thread, that alot of the sources out there are crap ???
I guess where I am going with this is that there are going to be quite a few gaps where there are not to be found info that can be footnoted... that somethings are just figured out by experiments and trying new things.
Could the wiki have different sections built into it? Like a glossary section, with definitions of terminology, and then techniques section, perhaps divided into beginning, and advanced? And then a section for experimental, or subjective topics? This way people would be forewarned that there are facts, and also grey areas both. It would allow the newer people to learn terms, and allow them better communication with others, and also leave open the chance for newer ideas as well.
if one had to own up to what they posted.
If there are gaps, there are gaps. I think we may find there is TONS of content we can put up before we start running into grey areas. The important thing will be to capture the "easy" 90% of stuff that no one will disagree on. There will always be subjective areas, but even such things as a comprehensive bonsai glossary would be of great benefit...
There are a few other bonsai wikis out there -- several deal with software, but a couple deal with trees. Google.
By using REAL names or initials. I will continue to find it difficult to consider information furnished by "Outlaw maverick" or other pseudonyms as being worth my consideration. You are who you are -- not someone else.
There are a few other bonsai wikis out there -- several deal with software, but a couple deal with trees. Google.
By using REAL names or initials. I will continue to find it difficult to consider information furnished by "Outlaw maverick" or other pseudonyms as being worth my consideration. You are who you are -- not someone else.
There are a few other bonsai wikis out there -- several deal with software, but a couple deal with trees. Google.