@peterbone no, I don't think so.
This is the part that attracts my concern
But please don't miss I said :
Yes, this area bothers me a lot too. I made the mistake of chasing down one of the judges at the 2014 USNBE for a critique as they were concluding their Sunday morning critiques, to which he begrudgingly agreed. He dessimated the tree in about 10 seconds, finished with, “we done?” And walked off. Well, he was right about several things, and I was determined to keep working to advance the tree. Another judge offered a similar critique, regarding the relative similar thickness of all 4-5 main branches emerging from the trunk, but concluded that as a deciduous tree, this was acceptable.
I assimilated all of the
critiques and decided to spend the next 5-7 years replacing those primary branches with new branches of differing thickenesses. I made some difficult cuts, knowing the tree would have some bald spots for a few years, but underestimated just how long they would remain bald. This area you circled on the right is one that has been most challenging to fill back in. Here we are in year 5.
Below in blue arrows you can see where the 3 removed branches were growing. So far, I have regretted the decision. However, had I not done it, I think I would be constantly concerned by the appearance. If you go to my blog and search “the cycle continues hawthorn” you can see a series of 5 or so articles dedicated to the rebuilding of this tree over the last 4.5 years.