Maiden69
Masterpiece
Coming along great, my yatsubusa root cuttings are at the same stage as yours on the first post... I think one of them could be working into something similar.
Yes thats right, I did the same with a Beech layer yesterday. I think both will adjust fairly quickly, more so the Elm.I'm curious why you decided to separate the layer now rather than in autumn. Was it just due to an abundance of healthy roots?
The layering process did indeed turn out really well, got a nice new pad of roots to play about with. Roots would of went crazy if I didn't get a re pot done this season. The root mass had conformed to the shape of the plastic tub, so vigorous.Good to see you're still on with this project! The layer came out really well.
Thanks, looking back I think the two central trunks can come closer together.Cool progression you have made on this.
Thanks for your input Woocash! Yes the sidetrunks seemed a little to 'forced' .I'd not seen this one before. What a nice progression, from root cutting to ground layer and a lovely clump forming. I think you made the right call with the side trunks.
Well, in my local woods it seems like the elms down one side are all just from one tree or root mass so I don't think you can have too many. I liked the silhouette in the image in post #7 and so I do think you need the width - either from the trunks you have cut back or from some extra trunks. They don't have to reach up high, but could just provide some lower width. I think the taper that your chops will create is more important than the direction they were moving in. If anything, to me the second established trunk on the left is a little too wiggly compared to the others and would look better reducing and growing out again as exaggerated movement would look better on a more tapered trunk.Thanks for your input Woocash! Yes the sidetrunks seemed a little to 'forced' .
Whats your opinion on adding more trunks as per last post, yay or nay? I think will add more overall interest and perspective.
You made some good points there, I appreciate your insight as a fellow nature man. All things I shall consider going forwards. Width sounds good, as well as reducing the wiggley trunk for taper. Height will come from the main trunk, the gate keeper. Im not looking for any taper in the middle trunk, it will be more of a trunk that splits into two, with a spreading, high crown that sort of covers the others like an umbrella.Well, in my local woods it seems like the elms down one side are all just from one tree or root mass so I don't think you can have too many. I liked the silhouette in the image in post #7 and so I do think you need the width - either from the trunks you have cut back or from some extra trunks. They don't have to reach up high, but could just provide some lower width. I think the taper that your chops will create is more important than the direction they were moving in. If anything, to me the second established trunk on the left is a little too wiggly compared to the others and would look better reducing and growing out again as exaggerated movement would look better on a more tapered trunk.
That said, keeping it higher until the rear one is established and can provide the height is also an option. This tree is young, effectively 5 years or so, so I'm sure there'll be various iterations until you settle on a final configuration.