It looks like but there are a few that look the similar.Would you @MichaelS agree that this is a young procumbens nana?
View attachment 328674View attachment 328675
It looks like but there are a few that look the similar.Would you @MichaelS agree that this is a young procumbens nana?
View attachment 328674View attachment 328675
There's no doubt about that."amcoffeegirl, post: 785581, member: 12890"]
Maybe we are referring to different trees than you. I would want to see a close up of the foliage
I will try to get a picture of one of mine from Plant City. It is one of those 30+ year old ones. I repotted it one year and started styling it the next. It has sat for two years with nothing but water, full sun and plenty of organic fertilizer. It has significant percentage of scale but the part that gets the least sun still has some juvenile foliage. It us super overgrown but I do plan on working on it soon. I have no doubt that as soon as I start cutting it will throw juvenile foliage.All I can tell you, Michael, is that at Plant City Bonsai they have some 30 to 35 year old Procumbens in nursery containers that sit in full sun, and have never been repotted. Most of them will have a mix of scale and juvi foliage. Some will be all scale, and some will stay full juvi.
I doubt that they ever get fertilized. They’re in typical nursery soil... peat and pine bark and sand mix.
But, when they get repotted, they revert to juvenile.
the two tree images above are parsonsIt looks like but there are a few that look the similar.
My question was not to debate but to address the actual issue.
There you are...the two tree images above are parsons
to stop growing these most ugly of junipers
I have a dozen of these of different sizes on my porch and several more throughout my landscape.instead of dealing with that monstrosity of a plant
It's funny how beauty is in the eye of the beholder.I don’t care what this is, I think it’s one of my favourite all time bonsai, let alone junipers. View attachment 328814
that’s...a parsonsBut the other one (post 154) is worse.
Procumbens have those “warts”, too. The warts are actually roots.There's no doubt about that.
I can't really see that one properly but if it has warts on the trunk, it's probably San Jose (which is yet another type of Chinese juniper) They make excellent grafting stock.
Very much so. Normally I find the so called green helmet quite characterless, like you say, a plastic cliche. I think this one with it’s two canopies and the configuration of the trunk and deadwood in between is just a lovely composition. Very architectural.It's funny how beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
I would have said the same thing a few years back. Now it looks to me like a plastic cliche. But the other one (post 154) is worse.
I have seen people working with very old procumbens in Japan, Bjorn for example worked one, and all have needles in fact many of them are used for grafting itoigawa, if they develop scales with time why these old specimens dont have scales assuming that if they do the japanese will encourage scales over neddles? the japanese sonare used for bonsai its different for the used in europe or us?
Why don’t we email Bjorn and ask him?I have seen people working with very old procumbens in Japan, Bjorn for example worked one, and all have needles in fact many of them are used for grafting itoigawa, if they develop scales with time why these old specimens dont have scales assuming that if they do the japanese will encourage scales over neddles? the japanese sonare used for bonsai its different for the used in europe or us?
Why don’t we email Bjorn and ask him?
So this is why I responded to Adair that removing entire "tufts" as such would leave many gapsMy guess is the common garden juniper like I'm showing won't grow scale foliage all over reliably. On my stuff it's patchy at best.
Arnold, procumbens in Japan aren’t that popular because they stay juvi, or revert to it when they get repotted and/or pruned.I have seen people working with very old procumbens in Japan, Bjorn for example worked one, and all have needles in fact many of them are used for grafting itoigawa, if they develop scales with time why these old specimens dont have scales assuming that if they do the japanese will encourage scales over neddles? the japanese sonare used for bonsai its different for the used in europe or us?