Isn't that the point? After all, "art" is the opposite of "nature." ?Amazing how man made really old trees looked. Some great trunks though.
Isn't that the point? After all, "art" is the opposite of "nature." ?
'Should' was a key word in your first sentence. And I agree. I understand what he means though, most of the trees at the national arboretum are in a more classical design. Classical design often results in trees that look crafted rather than natural. Also, these trees are maintained in show condition all year round, decade after decade. I think this adds to the man made feel.No. Should look like Real trees. Whether "art" remains huge debate. As Master Naka said: "Make Bonsai look like tree, Not tree like Bonsai". If you watch Ryan Neils Live stream presentations maybe can see he strives to use trees natural manner of growth to properly style with only added balancing to make pleasingly natural appearing trees. That would be good art rather than forcing an unnatural abomination.
No. Should look like Real trees. Whether "art" remains huge debate. As Master Naka said: "Make Bonsai look like tree, Not tree like Bonsai". If you watch Ryan Neils Live stream presentations maybe can see he strives to use trees natural manner of growth to properly style with only added balancing to make pleasingly natural appearing trees. That would be good art rather than forcing an unnatural abomination.
Honestly if you are suggesting that tree of life is your source for bonsai material you are fooling yourself into thinking any of these trees are going to make a decent bonsai in anything short of geological time. You need to find another place to search for trees-----or maybe you are a shill for this business? I don't mean to be confrontational but I have yet to see evidence of you working on a tree.Amazing!
Hey...who peed on your Wheaties this morning?Honestly if you are suggesting that tree of life is your source for bonsai material you are fooling yourself into thinking any of these trees are going to make a decent bonsai in anything short of geological time. You need to find another place to search for trees-----or maybe you are a shill for this business? I don't mean to be confrontational but I have yet to see evidence of you working on a tree.
I know that they are not, but is there any chance that some of the pre-1900 JWP's are grafted? I'm just noticing some swelling and differing bark characteristics?
It's not impossible those trees aren't grafted. The one I think you're looking at looks like a graft to me too. I don't know its specific history, unfortunately.I know that they are not, but is there any chance that some of the pre-1900 JWP's are grafted? I'm just noticing some swelling and differing bark characteristics?