Grow Box Size

coltranem

Chumono
Messages
759
Reaction score
1,009
Location
Massachusetts
USDA Zone
6a
Hi,
I am looking to get two of my trees into grow boxes next spring but I am a little unsure what size to make. I'd love some advice.

Tree 1: Red Maple
This has been growing out for size in a 2 gallon nursery pot. It sits abot 3 feet tall with a 1.25 root base. I'd to get it into a flat grow box to start building a flat root base. My thought on size is 5-6 inch deep and maybe 16 inch square. My target is a two foot tree with approximately 4 inches of base.

Tree 2: Small Juniper
I acquired this tree this summer and it is pretty root bound. I'd like to start getting it more vigorous and start a flatter base. This tree has a 1 inch base which I would like to grow. My size guess here is 3 inch deep 12 inch square.

20181021_144628.jpg20180708_154657.jpg
 

River's Edge

Masterpiece
Messages
4,746
Reaction score
12,760
Location
Vancouver Island, British Columbia
USDA Zone
8b
Hi,
I am looking to get two of my trees into grow boxes next spring but I am a little unsure what size to make. I'd love some advice.

Tree 1: Red Maple
This has been growing out for size in a 2 gallon nursery pot. It sits abot 3 feet tall with a 1.25 root base. I'd to get it into a flat grow box to start building a flat root base. My thought on size is 5-6 inch deep and maybe 16 inch square. My target is a two foot tree with approximately 4 inches of base.

Tree 2: Small Juniper
I acquired this tree this summer and it is pretty root bound. I'd like to start getting it more vigorous and start a flatter base. This tree has a 1 inch base which I would like to grow. My size guess here is 3 inch deep 12 inch square.

View attachment 214282View attachment 214283
For the maple i would build something 3-4 inches deep and 18 inches square. For the juniper i would use a deeper boxes 5-6 inches deep and 13 to 14 inches square. keep in mind the depth will not be filled completely and the method of construction may also reduce the depth. Ensure that the construction raises the base off the ground and the drainage is sufficient. it also helps to provide handles for the boxes.
Use solid wood not ply wood, particularily if you have a wetter climate.
 

coltranem

Chumono
Messages
759
Reaction score
1,009
Location
Massachusetts
USDA Zone
6a
I guess I should have been more clear. I meant the depth inside or usable depth not outside depth.
 

River's Edge

Masterpiece
Messages
4,746
Reaction score
12,760
Location
Vancouver Island, British Columbia
USDA Zone
8b
@River's Edge just curious why shallower on the maple.
Generally speaking you are trying to develop a shallower root base on maples, they are usually shown in shallower pots. The shallower box promotes that in keeping with more flare and radial spread that comes off the trunk. Spend some time looking at show maples and you will observe what i have mentioned.
 

Gaitano

Shohin
Messages
279
Reaction score
462
Location
St. Louis Missouri
USDA Zone
6A
These are the boxes I make, using 3.5" cedar. I can crank em out pretty quick. I think I cut the boards 10" long. Wood glue and a nail gun makes quick assembly.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3340.jpg
    IMG_3340.jpg
    266.3 KB · Views: 90
  • IMG_3341.jpg
    IMG_3341.jpg
    197.1 KB · Views: 76

coltranem

Chumono
Messages
759
Reaction score
1,009
Location
Massachusetts
USDA Zone
6a
I have seen that Japanese and Trident Maples would use a shallower pot but from what I have read red maples need a deeper pot.
 

Mike Hennigan

Chumono
Messages
955
Reaction score
1,580
Location
Ithaca, NY
USDA Zone
5b
These are the boxes I make, using 3.5" cedar. I can crank em out pretty quick. I think I cut the boards 10" long. Wood glue and a nail gun makes quick assembly.

Why 3.5 inch? Seems like an unecessarily HEAVY box. Cedar is already rot resistant, why not use a thinner plank? Something like a maple is not going to be in the box long enough for the cedar to rot. Maybe I am missing something. Please illuminate.
 

River's Edge

Masterpiece
Messages
4,746
Reaction score
12,760
Location
Vancouver Island, British Columbia
USDA Zone
8b
Why 3.5 inch? Seems like an unecessarily HEAVY box. Cedar is already rot resistant, why not use a thinner plank? Something like a maple is not going to be in the box long enough for the cedar to rot. Maybe I am missing something. Please illuminate.
The nominal dimension is likely referred to as 1 by 4 the actual measurements are closer to the 7.8 by 3 1/2 inch in various lengths. I use what is referred to as 1 by 6 actual dimensions are 7/8 thick by 5 3/4 inch wide in various lengths.
 

River's Edge

Masterpiece
Messages
4,746
Reaction score
12,760
Location
Vancouver Island, British Columbia
USDA Zone
8b
I have seen that Japanese and Trident Maples would use a shallower pot but from what I have read red maples need a deeper pot.
I have Japanese, Red and Trident in shallower grow boxes. I guess they never read the memo. I also use Anderson flats that are shallower and they still do well. With over 200 assorted Maples in development i do not feel like starting over;).
 

Mike Hennigan

Chumono
Messages
955
Reaction score
1,580
Location
Ithaca, NY
USDA Zone
5b
The nominal dimension is likely referred to as 1 by 4 the actual measurements are closer to the 7.8 by 3 1/2 inch in various lengths. I use what is referred to as 1 by 6 actual dimensions are 7/8 thick by 5 3/4 inch wide in various lengths.

Yes I am aware of how lumber measurements work, but 3.5, whatever the actual is, is still absurdly thick IMHO.
 

jeanluc83

Omono
Messages
1,452
Reaction score
1,623
Location
Eastern Connecticut
USDA Zone
6a
Yes I am aware of how lumber measurements work, but 3.5, whatever the actual is, is still absurdly thick IMHO.

3.5 is the width not the thickness. The box shown looks like it is about 12" square. Filled with soil and a tree the weight shouldn't be more than 25#.

I've used 2x4s to build boxes before. They are cheap. The untreated ones last 4-5 seasons before falling apart.
 

Wires_Guy_wires

Imperial Masterpiece
Messages
6,455
Reaction score
10,725
Location
Netherlands
I used the "the box should be slightly bigger than the entire canopy" rule. It's a rule of my own writing, so it's correct.. At least for me.
And it worked pretty well.

For pines especially, use the cheapest non-treated wood you can find (fir or spruce or pine). Why? Because that wood is going to feed your mycorrhizae so much that you'll have a hard time finding soil components after 8 months.
 

Mike Hennigan

Chumono
Messages
955
Reaction score
1,580
Location
Ithaca, NY
USDA Zone
5b
3.5 is the width not the thickness. The box shown looks like it is about 12" square. Filled with soil and a tree the weight shouldn't be more than 25#.

I've used 2x4s to build boxes before. They are cheap. The untreated ones last 4-5 seasons before falling apart.

Hahahah ok that makes more sense, I guess I was confused ?
 

River's Edge

Masterpiece
Messages
4,746
Reaction score
12,760
Location
Vancouver Island, British Columbia
USDA Zone
8b
Yes I am aware of how lumber measurements work, but 3.5, whatever the actual is, is still absurdly thick IMHO.
The only aspect that is thick is the OP bottom blocks for feet. His initial statement of cutting 10" lengths should have given the information needed to figure that out;). Actually the feet stay wet more than the rest of the box usually so that is a good choice.
 

coltranem

Chumono
Messages
759
Reaction score
1,009
Location
Massachusetts
USDA Zone
6a
Great suggestions. I might make the smaller box first with 1 x something pine and see if I neec to go up for the bigger box.
 
Top Bottom