Monster Procumbens

defra

Masterpiece
Messages
3,237
Reaction score
5,992
Location
The netherlands Zone 8b
USDA Zone
8b
Looking good thats some nice green foliage
Almosth time to thin it out some ?
 

fourteener

Omono
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
1,686
Location
Duluth MN
USDA Zone
3
Looking good thats some nice green foliage
Almosth time to thin it out some ?

I just did a mass thinning of foliage this spring. Left only the good growing tips and this is what happened. I have tough winters and would like to repot this tree in the spring. Because of those two factors, I'll let it grow as much foliage as it can thus year.

Also the foliage isn't strong enough yet to send out long extensions. That tells me it's still not real vigorous. Junipers maintain health through their foliage. Keep taking it away and the tree will make you pay for that.
 

Victorim

Omono
Messages
1,108
Reaction score
2,153
Location
Carmarthenshire, Wales, UK
USDA Zone
9b
I just did a mass thinning of foliage this spring. Left only the good growing tips and this is what happened. I have tough winters and would like to repot this tree in the spring. Because of those two factors, I'll let it grow as much foliage as it can thus year.

Also the foliage isn't strong enough yet to send out long extensions. That tells me it's still not real vigorous. Junipers maintain health through their foliage. Keep taking it away and the tree will make you pay for that.
Wise words. Love the tree. :)
 

Giga

Masterpiece
Messages
3,813
Reaction score
4,722
Location
Virginia beach, VA
USDA Zone
7-8
Very nice tree, can't wait to see it in a few years
 

music~maker

Shohin
Messages
392
Reaction score
704
Location
Boston, MA
USDA Zone
6b
View attachment 156984 Here it is after some heavy fertilization and new summer growth.
What are your future design plans? Have you considered losing that large lower left branch? I've seen this thread a couple times now, and my first thought is always that I'd want to remove at least that one, and possibly both of the lower branches and then re-build the trunk from there. You'd get a hell of a jin and an interesting carving project out of the deal. It would also tighten up the scale quite a bit. I know everyone likes cascading branches, but I think this would look excellent as more of an informal upright with that trunk.

Just a thought. It's a neat tree regardless of which path you choose. I don't see all that many procumbens with trunks this nice. The nice thing about these is that there's absolutely no rush given how slowly they grow.
 

my nellie

Masterpiece
Messages
2,288
Reaction score
2,631
Location
Athens, Greece
USDA Zone
9a
I would say the same as @Giga said, can't wait to see the tree in a few years but I would add : imagining a differently designed and styled tree following the suggestion of music-maker!
... ...Have you considered losing that large lower left branch?... ...I know everyone likes cascading branches, but I think this would look excellent as more of an informal upright with that trunk... ...I don't see all that many procumbens with trunks this nice.
 

Vin

Imperial Masterpiece
Messages
5,257
Reaction score
7,646
Location
Panama City, FL Zone 9a/8b Centr
USDA Zone
8b
Also the foliage isn't strong enough yet to send out long extensions. That tells me it's still not real vigorous. Junipers maintain health through their foliage. Keep taking it away and the tree will make you pay for that.
True indeed. I have paid for it many times over. More recently my BVF Time Capsule tree. Someone revived the thread accidently and I started removing foliage and wiring it when I knew it probably wasn't a good idea. I lost the most important branch and I'm pretty sure I'm going to lose the tree completely as it has been in a steady decline.
 

fourteener

Omono
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
1,686
Location
Duluth MN
USDA Zone
3
What are your future design plans? Have you considered losing that large lower left branch? I've seen this thread a couple times now, and my first thought is always that I'd want to remove at least that one, and possibly both of the lower branches and then re-build the trunk from there. You'd get a hell of a jin and an interesting carving project out of the deal. It would also tighten up the scale quite a bit. I know everyone likes cascading branches, but I think this would look excellent as more of an informal upright with that trunk.

Just a thought. It's a neat tree regardless of which path you choose. I don't see all that many procumbens with trunks this nice. The nice thing about these is that there's absolutely no rush given how slowly they grow.


Many Options are on the table. This tree has come a long way in a short time. I live in a constant state of trying to look for the smaller, better tree. At this point I am trying to see what my options are for something different. An interesting pot or stone might make the tree more interesting with those branches. I'm going to try at least a few things before I do my usual thing.

As I begin to see what veins of life I have on the trunk and that branch is also a determining factor. If I can make it interesting then it's staying, if it is relegated to being a long boring branch, removal is more of an option.
 

music~maker

Shohin
Messages
392
Reaction score
704
Location
Boston, MA
USDA Zone
6b
True indeed. I have paid for it many times over. More recently my BVF Time Capsule tree. Someone revived the thread accidently and I started removing foliage and wiring it when I knew it probably wasn't a good idea. I lost the most important branch and I'm pretty sure I'm going to lose the tree completely as it has been in a steady decline.
If the pot it's in is too restrictive, a quick and gentle up-pot followed by a couple years of recovery can make a huge difference. If it's declining going into winter, you don't have much to lose. With these I tend to only make big moves when they are very strong, and otherwise just make small redirects followed by long periods of growth, with the goal being to get them growing in a very balanced way. Either way, I grow a lot more than I prune.

Many Options are on the table. This tree has come a long way in a short time. I live in a constant state of trying to look for the smaller, better tree. At this point I am trying to see what my options are for something different. An interesting pot or stone might make the tree more interesting with those branches. I'm going to try at least a few things before I do my usual thing.

As I begin to see what veins of life I have on the trunk and that branch is also a determining factor. If I can make it interesting then it's staying, if it is relegated to being a long boring branch, removal is more of an option.

I would actually recommend that you leave it in that pot until you've gotten the development further along. It's already situated nicely, and these can go quite a few years between re-pots (usually 4-5 easily). Use the solid foundation it's sitting in as an opportunity to really get the branch structure in place that you want. Once you've really nailed the major branches and some ramification, then start thinking about other pots. I'd probably go another couple of years in this pot, then probably lift the root ball and clean it up just a bit, then re-pot in the same or equivalent size pot and go another 2-3 years. If you try to get too fancy with a pot that requires root reduction, you'll set the tree back and branch & trunk development will take much, much longer.

When I get a few minutes I'll photoshop you a virt of how I think it could develop. fwiw, there's no scenario I can imagine right now where the tree looks better with that big branch than without it. For me, it completely breaks the illusion of scale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vin

music~maker

Shohin
Messages
392
Reaction score
704
Location
Boston, MA
USDA Zone
6b
Many Options are on the table. This tree has come a long way in a short time. I live in a constant state of trying to look for the smaller, better tree. At this point I am trying to see what my options are for something different. An interesting pot or stone might make the tree more interesting with those branches. I'm going to try at least a few things before I do my usual thing.

As I begin to see what veins of life I have on the trunk and that branch is also a determining factor. If I can make it interesting then it's staying, if it is relegated to being a long boring branch, removal is more of an option.
Ok, this is pretty quick and dirty, but here's what jumped out at me when I first saw this.


Something along these lines wouldn't be too hard to achieve. Mostly all you'd need to do to get it there is to lose those two big branches (which you wouldn't have to do just now anyway) and then just let it slowly fill in, and occasional (very occasionally) prune it to the canopy. Mostly you'd just water it and watch it grow.

You could even build more of a trunk out of that apex if you wanted to by simply letting it run while keeping everything else in check. I think this is roughly a 6-10 year project to get there.

As an example, here's one of mine that I've been building from scratch. If you follow the various links I posted in that thread, you can follow it all the way back to what it looked like in 2010.

That's essentially how I would treat this one once I had dealt with those big branches. Let it grow and fill in that beautiful frame. Mine's just about ready for a full styling after seven years of balanced growth. Yours has the potential to be a much better tree with that trunk as the starting point.
 

Pachycaul

Mame
Messages
110
Reaction score
154
Location
New Mexico elev. 7660'
USDA Zone
6A
Arrrgh @fourteener, IMO, what you have in that tree could be called "an embarrassment of riches!" Biggest problems I see with it are "where do I go from here, and where's the front?" Good stuff!
 

MichaelS

Masterpiece
Messages
2,013
Reaction score
4,734
Location
Australia
Ok, this is pretty quick and dirty, but here's what jumped out at me when I first saw this.


Something along these lines wouldn't be too hard to achieve. Mostly all you'd need to do to get it there is to lose those two big branches (which you wouldn't have to do just now anyway) and then just let it slowly fill in, and occasional (very occasionally) prune it to the canopy. Mostly you'd just water it and watch it grow.

You could even build more of a trunk out of that apex if you wanted to by simply letting it run while keeping everything else in check. I think this is roughly a 6-10 year project to get there.

As an example, here's one of mine that I've been building from scratch. If you follow the various links I posted in that thread, you can follow it all the way back to what it looked like in 2010.

That's essentially how I would treat this one once I had dealt with those big branches. Let it grow and fill in that beautiful frame. Mine's just about ready for a full styling after seven years of balanced growth. Yours has the potential to be a much better tree with that trunk as the starting point.

Yes...


But I would try to keep the other branch ad put a bend in it?
pro.JPG
 

music~maker

Shohin
Messages
392
Reaction score
704
Location
Boston, MA
USDA Zone
6b
Yes...


But I would try to keep the other branch ad put a bend in it?
View attachment 160760

Yes, I could definitely see that. Truth be told, if this were mine, I'd get rid of the big branch first, and then see how it goes for a while. The bend is a great idea.

I tend to work these very slowly. The remaining longer branch definitely changes the scale of the tree (vs removing it), so I'd probably play around with scaling up the apex for a while to balance it out. Worst case, that would be work I would want to do anyway even if I was going to remove the second branch.

But yeah, that second branch does have some nice enough ramification to at least give it a chance first.

Either way, this is a tree that I'd love to work on.
 
Top Bottom