Always looking for suggestions
Great! In that spirit, I’ll offer a couple of observations. This issues I see are common to a lot of trees in development, so I want to share with you what I noted as I looked at your first tree. This is not a big deal, but a couple of tweaks in you how you view training broadleaf trees might help you make a more sophisticated and better developed branch structure. Here’s what I see with the branches on your first tree:
I see a lot of long straight branches with no taper and the only branching is way out at he tips of the branches. There’s some movement, but it’s all gentle curves - no abrupt direction changes that come from cutback. Many interior branches that likely could have been used to correct this appear to have been removed:
There are at least four major structural branches emerging from the same spot on the tree:
This likely cannot be maintained. Eventually it will cause swelling and inverse taper at that point on the tree
From these observations, I’d guess that the practice in developing this tree has been to grow the branches to length, wire in some movement and then begin pinching and removing interior buds. Ultimately this practice will not generate the taper, branching, or movement I’d like to see in more developed specimens - quite the opposite. Instead you’ll get young looking, straight branches with all of the development out at the end of the branch where the pinching has taken place. When trees like this have ended up in my collection, I’ve ended up simply removing most or all of the branches, severely cutting back the remainder and simply starting over again.
Scott