My problem with the recent "wary of AI trend"... (Now mind you... I'm a Luddite, as well, and I love sci-fi.)
...is that... Those warning us of, and consequently testing/probing, the violent capacities in these systems....
Are the same people involved IN programming them, and stand to gain, the most.
I believe we are DESIGNING ai WITH these capabilities for violence/anger... Just to FIT the trend...
Then "exposing" these prompts....for shock value.
They are making money on BOTH ends... Lazy Folks AND Conspiracy Theorists...
I've always though it (machine uprising) a fun possibility to explore, but always decimated by any experienced philosophical thought.
...that was, until we seemingly decided to make them WITH this capability. I believe our aspirations opened these gates and MAKE this theory MORE relevant...
Now it takes deeper philosophical analysis to argue against.
"Be careful! These robots/AI systems I'm creating, getting rich on, distributing ACTUALLY hold (preprogrammed) angst against humans and are (preprogrammed to be) CAPABLE to "take over violently".... Coming from the creators' mouths'....
"But DON't stop purchasing our products/services or investing... Don't do that!"
Does anyone ELSE see this blatant arrangement.
It's like US Cold Tea companies..... They pretty aggressively bash ALL the competition, until you realize that Lipton owns them all..