The Conflict: Twin trunk Thuja second styling

Atom#28

Chumono
Messages
557
Reaction score
1,261
Location
Eastern WA
USDA Zone
6b
Thank you for the video, I really love the movement of these trunks. Please excuse me for offering my read, especially because I am very new to bonsai.....but, respectfully, I gotta say: something about the daughter trunk doesn't feel "right". The drooping looping top looks cool, but it seems unnatural to my eye. I think my brain is asking: "Would a real tree in nature flip a 180 degree turn and start reaching straight for the ground?" I also wonder if the daughter tree is just too tall. It seems to have very little taper, if any, for most of the length of the trunk.

I'm gonna be brave and respectfully offer my suggestion. I may be WAY OFF, and I am definitely here to learn from all of you, but here's what I am thinking.
What would happen if you chopped the daughter down by about 2/3 of the current height? Maybe a nice jin on top? Sort of like this (Ignore the red line on my virt):

BEFORE:
260103




AFTER:


260104


All that negative space feels so much more dramatic, and natural. There's still conflict between mother and daughter. And it may even be more balanced
 

Atom#28

Chumono
Messages
557
Reaction score
1,261
Location
Eastern WA
USDA Zone
6b
After the bold trunk chop, I would then start training the apex of the mother a bit like this. I basically just flipped the leftward-growing branch at the apex over to the right side to let the mother ease into that negative space a bit. BONUS: now there's a more triangular orientation of foliage (another virt attempt:)

260114
 

BobbyLane

Imperial Masterpiece
Messages
6,061
Reaction score
17,694
Location
London, England
I like the material Raphael, it has lots of potential with a few styling options to ponder. i wouldnt call it mother n daughter or father n son though, simply because both trunks are of similar height and thickness. to my eye its just a twin trunk. would probably look great on a slab one day. also, i dont think reducing one of the trunks by half like the image above will make a better image, imo the interest, movement, flow, character will be decreased.

at first i wasnt sure about the second trunk dipping down at the apex, buts its starting to grow on me. of course, as the tree fills out, one wont notice the curvature as much
 
Last edited:

kouyou

Sapling
Messages
38
Reaction score
50
he drooping looping top looks cool, but it seems unnatural to my eye. I think my brain is asking: "Would a real tree in nature flip a 180 degree turn and start reaching straight for the ground?"

attached is one of my favorite maples on the planet, located at kouka-en. the use of the term 'natural' in bonsai can be misleading :)
 

Attachments

  • 4F430C6F-92EB-41EC-80D2-D7B2ED8B3B56.png
    4F430C6F-92EB-41EC-80D2-D7B2ED8B3B56.png
    290.4 KB · Views: 167

BobbyLane

Imperial Masterpiece
Messages
6,061
Reaction score
17,694
Location
London, England
attached is one of my favorite maples on the planet, located at kouka-en. the use of the term 'natural' in bonsai can be misleading :)

just depends if it works or not. sometimes such bends are done poorly and just come across looking contrived or forced. it can be done in a way that appears natural even though it might not be in the trees normal growth habit to have dipping branches. the maple is well and done and i think the thuja works too. horse chesnuts in the UK tend to grow with dipping branches but look nothing like the pine like tridents.

this horsechesnut is growing outside my front window, the subrunks rise up but the primarys and everything else dips or arcs down...the tree has a spooky look when naked
 

Attachments

  • 20190830_182437.jpg
    20190830_182437.jpg
    242.9 KB · Views: 147
  • 20190830_182433.jpg
    20190830_182433.jpg
    259.7 KB · Views: 76
Last edited:

Atom#28

Chumono
Messages
557
Reaction score
1,261
Location
Eastern WA
USDA Zone
6b
attached is one of my favorite maples on the planet, located at kouka-en. the use of the term 'natural' in bonsai can be misleading :)


My god, that tree is magnificent! I see the downward growing branches, but on the maple I do not see the same kind of extreme, wide, swooping loop-de-doo that OP's design includes.
 

BobbyLane

Imperial Masterpiece
Messages
6,061
Reaction score
17,694
Location
London, England
My god, that tree is magnificent! I see the downward growing branches, but on the maple I do not see the same kind of extreme, wide, swooping loop-de-doo that OP's design includes.

yeh but conifers in nature can easily grow in these contorted shapes. so its not far fetched
 

LanceMac10

Imperial Masterpiece
Messages
6,798
Reaction score
17,176
Location
Nashua, NH U.S.A.
USDA Zone
5
Nice material considering the species. Why not bring the fine base forwards in the pot? And a tilt to the viewers right by as much as twenty degrees would do wonders. Everything becomes more in focus as opposed to the leaning away feel this planting has. And you could eliminate the questionable bend on the smaller tree. Then you can reduce the lesser tree by introducing a new leader.


Foliage tendencies here might be a problem, always seem too "floppy" and detail wiring, (at least mine ;)😁 😁) doesn't seem to help as much as I would like.
 

Leo in N E Illinois

The Professor
Messages
11,339
Reaction score
23,280
Location
on the IL-WI border, a mile from ''da Lake''
USDA Zone
5b
Parent - child tree arrangements tend to relate to each other in multiples of one third.

Child should be either 2/3 the height of the parent or 1/3 the height of the parent. Same height, and or exactly half the height tend to work less well. I would reduce the "child" and eliminate the loop. Just my 2 cents.
 

Adair M

Pinus Envy
Messages
14,402
Reaction score
34,885
Location
NEGeorgia
USDA Zone
7a
Rafael,

There is a fundamental issue that throws your design off balance, and that is the planting angle. You keep calling it a “mother-daughter” (or father-son) composition, yet the smaller tree is growing on higher ground. The tree on the left needs to be on higher ground than the smaller tree. Shifting the angle so that it is on top of the mound would also bring its apex more on top of the lesser tree.

It should look as if the lesser tree is trying to move out, away from the taller tree. That swooping branch that comes from the top, back, and then comes in between the two to the front is just plain and simply convoluted.

I think an angle change, and some guy wires pulling the two trunks in closer together is a better styling choice. Other than the artificial “swoop”, the movement of the two trunks mirror each other, which is nice. They “complement” each other not “conflict” with each other, except for that “swoop” branch. Direct the movement of the second tree out to the right, out and towards the light, and you’ll have a pleasing composition.
 
Messages
168
Reaction score
194
Location
Montreal, Canada.
USDA Zone
6a
Thank you for the video, I really love the movement of these trunks. Please excuse me for offering my read, especially because I am very new to bonsai.....but, respectfully, I gotta say: something about the daughter trunk doesn't feel "right". The drooping looping top looks cool, but it seems unnatural to my eye. I think my brain is asking: "Would a real tree in nature flip a 180 degree turn and start reaching straight for the ground?" I also wonder if the daughter tree is just too tall. It seems to have very little taper, if any, for most of the length of the trunk.

I'm gonna be brave and respectfully offer my suggestion. I may be WAY OFF, and I am definitely here to learn from all of you, but here's what I am thinking.
What would happen if you chopped the daughter down by about 2/3 of the current height? Maybe a nice jin on top? Sort of like this (Ignore the red line on my virt):

BEFORE:
View attachment 260103




AFTER:


View attachment 260104


All that negative space feels so much more dramatic, and natural. There's still conflict between mother and daughter. And it may even be more balanced
I think your suggestion of decreasing the height of the daughter trees is excellent. Except that to do that, and I am sure you are aware of that, I will need to approach graft the the foliage first or wait until and if some growth spring up at the right place as in conifers any branch without a growing tip will eventually loose any foliage it may still have (in the case of pines) and then completely die. This being a Thuja, any remaining growing tip is fine to keep the branch alive but a branch or trunk without anything growing in it is deadwood.
 

M. Frary

Bonsai Godzilla
Messages
14,307
Reaction score
22,120
Location
Mio Michigan
USDA Zone
4
I think your suggestion of decreasing the height of the daughter trees is excellent. Except that to do that, and I am sure you are aware of that, I will need to approach graft the the foliage first or wait until and if some growth spring up at the right place as in conifers any branch without a growing tip will eventually loose any foliage it may still have (in the case of pines) and then completely die. This being a Thuja, any remaining growing tip is fine to keep the branch alive but a branch or trunk without anything growing in it is deadwood.
Cut it off at the ground.
 
Messages
168
Reaction score
194
Location
Montreal, Canada.
USDA Zone
6a
Cut it off at the ground.
I might just do that in the future but unlike how you perhaps cynically suggest, I may cut it perpendicular to the planting plane between the two trunks and separate the conflicting parent and child. I feel each could be a good tree in its own right.
 

Dav4

Drop Branch Murphy
Messages
13,098
Reaction score
30,140
Location
SE MI- Bonsai'd for 12 years both MA and N GA
USDA Zone
6a
Rafael,

There is a fundamental issue that throws your design off balance, and that is the planting angle. You keep calling it a “mother-daughter” (or father-son) composition, yet the smaller tree is growing on higher ground. The tree on the left needs to be on higher ground than the smaller tree. Shifting the angle so that it is on top of the mound would also bring its apex more on top of the lesser tree.

It should look as if the lesser tree is trying to move out, away from the taller tree. That swooping branch that comes from the top, back, and then comes in between the two to the front is just plain and simply convoluted.

I think an angle change, and some guy wires pulling the two trunks in closer together is a better styling choice. Other than the artificial “swoop”, the movement of the two trunks mirror each other, which is nice. They “complement” each other not “conflict” with each other, except for that “swoop” branch. Direct the movement of the second tree out to the right, out and towards the light, and you’ll have a pleasing composition.
I could be wrong, but I don’t think Rafael agrees with you.
 

sorce

Nonsense Rascal
Messages
32,912
Reaction score
45,593
Location
Berwyn, Il
USDA Zone
6.2
I could be wrong, but I don’t think Rafael agrees with you.

Got quote jumped.

@Rafael Najmanovich you issued some stuff.👆

Quote jumping is the phenomenon where the OP jumps down to a quote that they got summoned to and don't go back up to check for other content.

Sorce
 

MACH5

Imperial Masterpiece
Messages
6,104
Reaction score
28,725
Location
Northern New Jersey
I learned how to control that from John Wall at the show this year.
Cut the fronds.


Mike, they can be tricky to manage and all depends on your preference. I like the fronds to be nice a neat. So like John I cut them back but... I do take advantage of their drooping nature and style my pads going downwards instead of upwards. Others let the foliage grow more "naturally". But I think when you have the fronds more tightly managed it imparts the tree with a really nice sense of scale. I love them! One of the very best native species for bonsai in my opinion and they love the cold!

The tree posted by Rafael is a nice piece of material!

Apologies for the momentary highjack! 🙏
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom