RichKid
Shohin
At what point is a tree to large to be chopped? For one growing in the woods, would it be better to chop it and leave it in the ground for a while, or to collect it and then chop it?
Yeah I've tired with some spruce a few times, all resulted in death. I was thinking maybe it was the moving time. I'm personally not really attracted to conifers anyway, but I thought I would just try to expand my collection and give myself some things to work on. Unfortunately I don't have a backhoe! LOL But I do have a strong young back! I would think I'd be digging a lot of these which is why I would want to reduce the top because obviously handling a 15 or 20 foot tree could be cumbersome, not to mention transporting in an SUV.You should keep in mind the way the soil is and how it can help you. Here I can move most any hardwood 10-15ft with very little effort other then charging the battery on the backhoe and single scoop them. On the not good side storms like Sandy rip trees out pretty easy. I find messing with any conifer usually does not work out btw...
what would make success less likely, outside of species of course, height or girth of the tree? I noticed some decent sized pines and other deciduous material out in the woods. Maybe fifteen to twenty feet tall. Decent sized trunks. Was thinking maybe they are too big but I've never tried anything like that. I usually collect small stuff no bigger than a few feet tops.
Pines...most likely amount (percentage) of foliage remaining after the chop.
What is the likely hood of back budding on a pine? These are the regular pines you find in woods, also called the Pine Barrens, of southern NJ.
From what I've read...very unlikely. A total top off will most likely spell death to the tree.
From what I've read...very unlikely. A total top off will most likely spell death to the tree.
I agree - they are far more sensitive at least the one's I killed here a few years ago. Even the seedings require very special care.
It might depend on the species. I asked a friend a similar question as my parents' property has a lot of american hornbeam growing on it. I figured that I could chop them, keep them in the ground, and collect them a year or two later after they had had a chance to back bud and develop new leaders. Apparently american hornbeam do not respond very well to this, so it was recommended to me to chop and dig at the same time.
Mike is right. When I first started collecting, I chopped Carolina hornbeam and left them in place. They mostly died. I suspect it's because they are understory trees that have spent their lives outcompeting their neighboring trees. Once their hard-won (growing in the shadows of larger trees isn't easy) foliage-bearing branches are taken, they can't effectively support themselves with spindly new growth. The reaction can vary in degree, depending, I think on location. The more light, the more chance the tree has...I've also seen substantial trunk death in some instances on hornbeam left in-ground after a chop.
Seeing those trees die made me see that they should be taken all at once, trunk chop, root reduction, removal ALL AT ONCE. This drastic "reset" allows them to develop root growth AND top growth at the same time, without one suffering at the expense of the other...
Ask and ye shall receive. Looks like I've made a mistake last weekend. I hope it's not too late to correct it. I was under the impression that understory trees were fine for a year. Perhaps that was our discussion about beech though. I left a beech and it did well, the hornbeam that I... OH MY! Looks like an emergency removal is in order, stat!