Q-Bonsai
Mame
I am starting to turn a lot more attention to brooms. What I found is that, for the most part, they look very similar to one another.
In informal upright, trees can differentiate themselves with their trunk lines. However, since brooms generally don't have taper, are upright, and have intense ramification, they all seem to look similar to the untrained eye. Could this possibly be the reason for their lack of popularity?
Walter Pall "introduces" the informal broom which allows for more differentiation. What is the defining line between formal/informal upright with terrific ramification and branch placement versus an informal broom?
I love Walter's "movement" to make deciduous tree look more like what they are. How can we make compelling designs to support that? This alters the approach to developing rough stack completely! Trunk chopping would no longer be as simple as flat cut/develop the broom or cut, develop a leader.
Inputs?
In informal upright, trees can differentiate themselves with their trunk lines. However, since brooms generally don't have taper, are upright, and have intense ramification, they all seem to look similar to the untrained eye. Could this possibly be the reason for their lack of popularity?
Walter Pall "introduces" the informal broom which allows for more differentiation. What is the defining line between formal/informal upright with terrific ramification and branch placement versus an informal broom?
I love Walter's "movement" to make deciduous tree look more like what they are. How can we make compelling designs to support that? This alters the approach to developing rough stack completely! Trunk chopping would no longer be as simple as flat cut/develop the broom or cut, develop a leader.
Inputs?