This bald cypress. Everyone hates the roots but I love them.
View attachment 184187
Sweet Baby Jesus! I can see why people have problems with this tree. The important thing is that you know why people have problems with this tree. Keep going and see where this takes you.
I endorse non-conformist bonsai. As long as the person styling the trees understands why their tree does not conform to standard bonsai aesthetics, there should be no problem.
Where the problem comes in (IMHO) is when the non-conforming artist gets into a rant about how the bonsai community doesn't like their tree. This is art, people. It has genre-defining elements which constrain what does and what does not fit. If someone hears "That tree has problems as a bonsai" and pushes forward with a non-conformist approach, there is no room to complain later on when no one likes the tree.
Not following convention is a great way to explore the art form and see what qualities will bend or be reshaped. I've done non-conformist trees. Ugly non-bonsai trees that I loved. When a friend insulted the tree to my face "Bill, you do know this looks like shit, right?" I accepted the assessment. I had tried to push boundaries and the art form would not budge. That's okay by me. I'll push somewhere else. One long-time artist, whose opinion I value greatly, looked at one of my trees and said "It's too tall. You should have started your apex earlier." I knew it was too tall and I have my reasons for keeping it that way. If I ever enter the tree in a show or exhibition and it is criticized for being too tall, I have no right to complain. If my reason for making it tall is not apparent, then the failure is mine. It is not the fault of the art form.