There are people doing it both ways. I've tried letting the trunk grow untouched then doing a chop but found the larger cut required can take many years to heal over. Trunks grown like this also tend to have little taper. It also takes many years for the replacement leader to grow to match the thicker base.
I now prune more regularly, usually annually for most maples. Such pruning does not seem to reduce thickening much, if at all. As a result of the earlier pruning I get lots of new leaders growing. All those leaders add up to the same growth the tree had before the chop so thickening is still happening. Each new leader that grows gives a different option for pruning next time so I have choices of front, trunk bends and most important, lots of taper in the lower trunk. When it comes to pruning each individual leader is smaller than the main trunk so after pruning I have several smaller cuts instead of one huge cut. Smaller cuts heal over in just a few years and usually much neater.
Note that this is not to stop them getting too tall. It is all about taper, options for trunk lines + smaller cuts.
I would not go back to growing tall, straight telephone poles with a larger final chop.