Bill S
Masterpiece
Another fine tree Harry, that must have been some party.
Bet Dale will have a big grin over those comments.
Bet Dale will have a big grin over those comments.
Il mio caro...
You have made the assumption that the best representative of my collection would benefit from your advice. I mean no disrespect whatsoever when I tell you it would not... and knowing how precious your time must be with preparing to leave on the wanker tour... I will not waste your time.
I think the community would be better served if you made this very kind and generous offer to another, and I have no doubt many will line up for the opportunity, and rightly so.
Molto grazie, ma nessun....You'll see an example of my work and style soon enough...
Kindest regards,
Victrinia
I told you if you hung around you could expect a suprise, Marco "the hack" Invernizzi, or in some circles "the marketing idiot" got around to styling my Itoigawa, once I got him off this board. I thought you would like to see the results, so you could judge for yourself, I'm the one in the hat. Since some people were a little upset about the redneck picture on Marco's website in the before & after section, we thought we would update the picture so as to not offend anyone again.
keep it green,
Harry
LINK: http://www.marcoinvernizzi.com/
I told you if you hung around you could expect a suprise, Marco "the hack" Invernizzi, or in some circles "the marketing idiot" got around to styling my Itoigawa, once I got him off this board. I thought you would like to see the results, so you could judge for yourself, I'm the one in the hat. Since some people were a little upset about the redneck picture on Marco's website in the before & after section, we thought we would update the picture so as to not offend anyone again.
keep it green,
Harry
LINK: http://www.marcoinvernizzi.com/
Hey Harry, Does Marco know the "M" is backwards on his website?
Just thought he should know......
Marco,
No-one has out right said that your tool is not good. I've never used it, but I can see how it would be a beneficial tool to have. But besides the start up cost (which you mentioned earlier) how do you justify charging $350 for it? Can you answer this question directly or no?
There are many new products out there that cost a lot to design and market but the sellers don't necessarily try to make all that money back by charging outrages prices for their product...which based on what you've posted about your start-up costs it sounds like that is what you are trying to do. I think the outrageous price is what most people have a problem with.
Marco,
Thanks for trying to answer my question, though you still mention points that to me still do not justify the price. But, thanks anyway and good luck to you.
There are many new products out there that cost a lot to design and market but the sellers don't necessarily try to make all that money back by charging outrages prices for their product...which based on what you've posted about your start-up costs it sounds like that is what you are trying to do. I think the outrageous price is what most people have a problem with.
I'm writing this as I wait for my professor to come in and give us our corporate finance final...
Sellers do try to make all that money back, and they charge what they have to in order to accomplish that. If a new product isn't going to make the company money, then they aren't going to produce it. Marco should charge what he needs to make money on it. I can't say how much the production costs are, nor can I say what the SG&A costs are (selling, general, and administrative, basically all the other overhead). Most businesses consider a 3-5 year break even on new products as reasonable.