Cjr Crataegus aestivalis 1

Introducing my Daisugi Mayhaw. The straight trunks will be left alone for a while longer before being chopped to final heights.
PS: I have yet to find another Daisugi style hawthorn bonsai. Have you seen any?
Before
IMG_8249.jpeg

AfterIMG_8250.jpeg
IMG_8251.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Introducing my Daisugi Mayhaw. The straight trunks will be left alone for a while longer before being chopped to final heights.
PS: I have yet to find another Daisugi style hawthorn bonsai. Have you seen any?
Before
View attachment 503978

AfterView attachment 503979
View attachment 503980
I am a bit unsure about how tall to keep the straight trunks. I am thinking 2.5 times the main tree height. Is that enough? In nature it is about 3-4 times but that will keep my bonsai at nearly 4 ft high!!
 
Uncle, What style are we calling this?
I am imitating a daisugi. I haven’t finished wiring it yet but the main tree is down below and the shoots will soar.
I am just having fun and express my feelings with the trees. I truly can't say there is a style I am going after with a lot of my trees. I just train them as I see fit.

IMG_1239.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Pruned today. The bottom is more defined with the up right trunk causing more definition at the base. 2 ft were chopped off the tops. Ramification at these tops will be the key for the future styling of this tree.
IMG_2606.jpeg
IMG_2608.jpeg
 
Incredible. I’m fascinated with the style.

Is the plan to shorten each of the straight trunks/apexes/and the overall canopy for scale (relative to base trunk size)?
IMG_6895.jpeg
 
Incredible. I’m fascinated with the style.

Is the plan to shorten each of the straight trunks/apexes/and the overall canopy for scale (relative to base trunk size)?
View attachment 555521
No. The plan is to keep the towering height but develop a tight canopy on top. It was not easy to get such a group of very straight trunk on a hawthorn, which tend to have zigzag growth. I am not going to lose that. The base will be repeatedly pruned back to get the aged gnarly look of the mother tree.
 
No. The plan is to keep the towering height but develop a tight canopy on top. It was not easy to get such a group of very straight trunk on a hawthorn, which tend to have zigzag growth. I am not going to lose that. The base will be repeatedly pruned back to get the aged gnarly look of the mother tree.
Would reducing the height to get the right scale and proportion lose the straightness of the multiple trunks?
 
Would reducing the height to get the right scale and proportion lose the straightness of the multiple trunks?
My tree right now is actually on the right scale that are similar to the real daisugi that are in the earlier phase of their log producing life cycle.
 
My tree right now is actually on the right scale that are similar to the real daisugi that are in the earlier phase of their log producing life cycle.
The reason I asked about the proportion and scale is the individual trunks are 1/3 or 1/4 the thickness of the base they grow off of and given their height, the composition appears as is (close to the viewer and the height they exist in).

I was thinking you are planning to, then, lengthen and thicken the base/trunk they are growing out of in order to make them appear like a forest and a good distance away from the viewer (proportion and scale).

I was reasoning my way through the thickness of each trunk and their massive height and how to reduce them (or their appearance given their current state). Would lengthening and thickening e base accomplish that or would shortening each trunk and limiting their foliage prevent them from outgrowing/out widening their proportion in relation to the base?

I’m not trying to challenge you in a negative context or be difficult. Just trying to understand the relationship between slab size/trunk base, height/overall appearance of the average forest composition compared to one that is created ontop of a trunk/base (in the spirit and style of Daisugi).
 
The reason I asked about the proportion and scale is the individual trunks are 1/3 or 1/4 the thickness of the base they grow off of and given their height, the composition appears as is (close to the viewer and the height they exist in).

I was thinking you are planning to, then, lengthen and thicken the base/trunk they are growing out of in order to make them appear like a forest and a good distance away from the viewer (proportion and scale).

I was reasoning my way through the thickness of each trunk and their massive height and how to reduce them (or their appearance given their current state). Would lengthening and thickening e base accomplish that or would shortening each trunk and limiting their foliage prevent them from outgrowing/out widening their proportion in relation to the base?

I’m not trying to challenge you in a negative context or be difficult. Just trying to understand the relationship between slab size/trunk base, height/overall appearance of the average forest composition compared to one that is created ontop of a trunk/base (in the spirit and style of Daisugi).
It’s all good. I am in a new territory so any input is very welcome.
 
Back
Top Bottom