What you say is all true, but these facts are not part of any arguments for or against organic soil I am aware of.
@
shohin_branches plants can take up organic compounds that contain nitrogen.
"Although there is evidence that plants can acquire amino acids, small peptides, and (partial) proteins from the soil [
8], a high impact in agricultural contexts was traditionally ruled out [
5,
9]. However, in recent years, many studies opened new questions. First observations proved that the supply of sole amino acids sustains plant growth, and were soon followed by the characterization of root transport systems for amino acid uptake, whose molecular bases were partly elucidated in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana L.) and confirmed in crops [
10,
11]. At the same time, it was proven that the provision of amino acids, even at a very low concentration, can affect root morphology and plant growth [
12]. Similarly, considering that urea-based formulations account for over 50% of total N fertilizers applied in agriculture, the discovery of urea transporters in the plasma membrane (PM) of root cells has drawn attention to a direct use of this nutrient by plants [
13]."
They can also take up sugars. Problem is that it is hard to study if larger molecules are taken up directly, or broken down by microbes first, and then their metabolites being absorbed by the plants.A
And since nitrogen salts are much much cheaper that peptides or amino acids, the former are preferred. When both are present in the soil, it is just hard to figure out which percentage a plant gets from one source, or the other. And what source is preferred.
Hydroponics people like to talk about adding peptides. There is research on possible benefits. But it is not common practice.
This all ignoring the meme discussion on if urea is an organic compounds. Even for urea, it is though that most nitrogen coming from urea taken up by the plant is first broken down in the soil.