Vance Wood
Lord Mugo
It takes a craft to create an art but it takes an art to give a craft something to do that is more than to copy something or someone else.
Ok. So, let’s say a potter makes a cool new style pot. Never been done before. Everyone loves it. Is that art?It takes a craft to create an art but it takes an art to give a craft something to do that is more than to copy something or someone else.
Ok. So, let’s say a potter makes a cool new style pot. Never been done before. Everyone loves it. Is that art?
YES
If yes, then what if the potter decides to cash in, and make dozens of those pots. Each identical to the first one. Are those art? Or has it now become craft?
BOTH
And then, what becomes of the first one? Since it’s been copied, it’s not unique in any way. Has it lost it’s “art” status?
YES It has lost its art status but it does not change the fact that it took art to create it in the first place. Art is the echo from the soul craft is the rendering of its physical appeal.
What qualifications do you use for rate quality? This definition sounds good but is fundamentally flawed.If an person is an artist because he says so, am I a Master of bonsai because I say so? The short answer is No. What's the difference between a putterer and a craftsman? The level of quality of output is the deciding factor in almost all endeavors...
The Japanese have a word; Kami, meaning a spiritual quality that endues something with a quality that is more or less unfathomable and cannot be added to it or extracted from it.What qualifications do you use for rate quality? This definition sounds good but is fundamentally flawed.
For example a bonsai pot, do you rate quality because the pot will last 1,000 years? Or because a majority of the current population likes the shape, or glaze, or both? Or maybe it is highly functional compared to others in someway? How about if it was commissioned for a specific tree, is it quality because it fits the tree in the absolute best possible way? In all seasons? Or maybe just the season that it will be shown next? Best pot for the health of the tree? Or it best matches the exact specifications the buyer described? Or it is different then the buyer described but is closer to what they want because the maker of the pot made choices the buyer didn’t know/think of?
The list can go on for as long as someone has the imagination for. I don’t want to sound rude but the long list was the ‘best’ way I could describe the issue.
This is the problem with all of the answers I have heard that seem to be closest to describing art vs craft accurately (to me) there is just one phrase or word that doesn’t sit right and if looked at closer leaves the definition open for interpretation.
I don’t have the answer and maybe there isn’t one. I believe that is a possibility that is often overlooked in discussions like this...
@Forsoothe! I didn’t want to tear into your definition specifically over someone else’s but you were the last to post when I had time/ was able to put my finger on what was bugging me with a lot of these attempts to define a difference between these two things. No hard feelings I swear![]()
"It is art, if the artist says it is Art".
It takes a craft to create an art but it takes an art to give a craft something to do that is more than to copy something or someone else.
Picasso said “good artists copy, great artists steal!”Ok. So, let’s say a potter makes a cool new style pot. Never been done before. Everyone loves it. Is that art?
If yes, then what if the potter decides to cash in, and make dozens of those pots. Each identical to the first one. Are those art? Or has it now become craft?
And then, what becomes of the first one? Since it’s been copied, it’s not unique in any way. Has it lost it’s “art” status?
I’ll stand by my definition. What’s being discussed here is “the politics of art “. It is the tension between consumers, makers, and institutions of what will be. I wrote “artist “ on my tax return for 6 years. Does that make me an artist? History will be the final arbiter. My advice.... less talk, more action! Go buy it, make it and advocate for it. Embrace the paradox.Art is a verb. It is the act of self expression. Every time you open your mouth, post a comment, draw a picture or wire a tree, you are committing an act of self expression. It is as common as dirt. We as a whole call these acts “art” when we want to elevate them out of the mud of being ordinary. Science is observation. Art is expressing what we have observed.
He worked on that painting for more than five years. He carried it around with him during his travels.Lets think of it this way....If your work (lets say on a Bonsai Tree Landscape) involves your personal Creativity and Craftsmanship and thus enjoyed, appreciated, emotionally experienced by others then it can be considered Art...
The key determinants here, to be considered Art, are Creativity mixed and Displayed with your Craftsmanship...
DiVinci's Mona Lisa ,,,,,,,,,,,,.. he used a model to capture his size, form, scale.....he used his remarkable Creativity to show
the eyes, the smile, the background, the coloring, etc, etc, and he accomplished this over a 5 year period…...