So I may learn from looking at the picture of this tree; Would it be better if it didn' t have all of those S curves? Thanks in advance, again, I want to know where it went wrong.
Joedes, I would compare it to someone trying to write a book when they don't know the alphabet. In this case, you are asking the wrong question. The question is not about the design of the tree - because the tree is wrong before you even GET to the design.
I will try to distill this into as simple of a concept as I can.
Think of bonsai like a pyramid (I'm talking figuratively here, not literally) You can't build a pyramid until each later underneath is solid. The lower layers are more important than the upper layers. It is the same with bonsai. The most important part of the bonsai is the nebari - the base of the tree where it meets the soil. It gives the tree its power and character - it is the hardest thing to get right, and takes the longest to develop. From the nebari, working your way up the tree, the next most important part is the trunk - it's character, line and taper. Then you get to branches - their placement, taper, line, etc. Then you get to the ends of the branches and see the ramification, balance, and character of the foliage.
I am keeping this really simple but the point is this - it doesn't MATTER if you have great ramification if the trunk is flawed. It doesn't MATTER if you have perfect branches if the nebari is weak. You have to fix the important things first, and then move on with the rest of the tree.
When someone who knows black pines looks as this tree, we see a 3 year old tree seedling with nothing else going for it. It has NO nebari, it has NO trunk, it has no age or character. It is not a bonsai. To MAKE it a bonsai you have to start with the basics - which starts with improving the nebari and thickening the trunk, which in black pines takes YEARS. So that is why people aren't commenting on the design.
I am not trying to be mean or give any offense to the original poster whatsoever.