I'm really glad you brought it because it's given me a lot of food for thought
I noticed that several larger branches/subtrunks in the elms had been broken off instead of cut off and healed over. There would be a small snag left as though something had fallen and snapped it off, or wind sheared the branch off. That part
really worked for me and like a great bit of attention to detail.
At the same time, I could tell that you were rather rigorous about how the fine twigs were handled -- I didn't see many or any stubbed twigs leftover from summer pruning. The control in those twigs made the snapped branches and subtrunks more intentional to me in a good way. The contrast there really helped it
Definitely allowed, though whether it "works" for me might be different than for you. I didn't mind the frog or the owl, but fox felt too much. It's chest was thicker than most of the trees in the composition. The literality of the composition worked against that part, imo
This is a super intriguing thought. I'm super curious to see this in action, but now I'm wondering if anyone has ever done this and I missed it because I wasn't expecting it