21st century kids
- Thread starter AlainK
- Start date
Are you stupid or just lazy. Wiki? Are you serious?
Whttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2131458/Up-articles-Wikipedia-contain-factual-errors.html
The Top 10 Reasons Students Cannot Cite or Rely On Wikipedia
To help you understand the limits of Wikipedia's reliability and credibility, we present 10 reasons you can't completely trust information on Wikipedia.
www.findingdulcinea.com
Wikipedia Gets 9 Out of 10 Health Ailments Wrong
Researchers found errors and inaccurate assertions in 9 out of 10 Wikipedia entries on the costliest medical conditions
Why is Wikipedia an unreliable source? - eNotes.com
Get an answer for 'Why is Wikipedia an unreliable source?' and find homework help for other Reference questions at eNotes
www.enotes.com
NOW GIVE ME AN EXAMPLE WHERE PSEUDOSCINCE WAS USED. Instead of attacking a blogger who is just a host for information. Hint........ It takes more than just a ''click'', You might need to do some research.
amcoffeegirl
Masterpiece
I am a big fan of saving the earth and protecting wildlife.
I do believe in climate change and in melting ice caps.
I would love to see solar panels replace asphalt shingles. I wish that wind energy could charge my vehicle.
I don’t want to see animal and plant species become extinct.
I don’t see why It would hurt us by using cleaner energy. Reducing pollution should not be a partisan issue.
Our parents and grandparents did more for the environment than we are doing today!
It doesn’t hurt my feelings to try and provide clean air, clean water and less waste.
I do believe in climate change and in melting ice caps.
I would love to see solar panels replace asphalt shingles. I wish that wind energy could charge my vehicle.
I don’t want to see animal and plant species become extinct.
I don’t see why It would hurt us by using cleaner energy. Reducing pollution should not be a partisan issue.
Our parents and grandparents did more for the environment than we are doing today!
It doesn’t hurt my feelings to try and provide clean air, clean water and less waste.
coh
Imperial Masterpiece
You're wasting your time trying to convince any of these folks! There's nothing you can post that will make them reconsider their positions. That's why I gave up and no longer bother interacting with them.
Apart from this.....''I wish that wind energy could charge my vehicle.''
I agree with everything you say!
Blimpsandmtn
Yamadori
I should say the same for youAre you stupid or just lazy. Wiki? Are you serious?
Whttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2131458/Up-articles-Wikipedia-contain-factual-errors.html
The Top 10 Reasons Students Cannot Cite or Rely On Wikipedia
To help you understand the limits of Wikipedia's reliability and credibility, we present 10 reasons you can't completely trust information on Wikipedia.www.findingdulcinea.comWikipedia Gets 9 Out of 10 Health Ailments Wrong
Researchers found errors and inaccurate assertions in 9 out of 10 Wikipedia entries on the costliest medical conditionstime.com
Why is Wikipedia an unreliable source? - eNotes.com
Get an answer for 'Why is Wikipedia an unreliable source?' and find homework help for other Reference questions at eNoteswww.enotes.com
NOW GIVE ME AN EXAMPLE WHERE PSEUDOSCINCE WAS USED. Instead of attacking a blogger who is just a host for information. Hint........ It takes more than just a ''click'', You might need to do some research.
You've blatantly ignored my image showing that your question could've been solved with a click and immediately "went for the jugular" to attack the wiki link with no proof other than your desire to be anti conformist.
I understand that most conservative sites will give you this anti global warming information and you have the gut to say I'm the one in the trap.
I've given you more than enough information to show that your claim is false and even went through the trouble to go through actual peer reviewed scholar work and government information yet for some odd reason you're so set on giving me the same response that's the equivalent to saying "but it's not" with no back up.
Its not that we're incapable, it's more like you're incapable to accept actual fact and reason in trade for fanaticism and bias.
A feeble response with no substance - yet again.
Exactly who is anti global warming?
What claim are you referring to? The one about co2 not being the control knob of global temps? Where is the information showing me that it is false?
I am quite capable of accepting fact I assure you. First you should familiarize yourself with the meaning of the word ''fact'' and then get back to me with your fact.
No back up for what? to what? What the hell are you talking about?
@Blimpsandmountain.
Ok I have checked out your post using google chrome and now I see your graph there. I couldn't before. It's complete garbage which I will prove to you when I have a bit more time.
John Cook, the bloke who runs ''Skeptical'' science (actually they don't know the meaning of the word sceptical over there) is moron, alarmist cartoonist. I will get to him as well.
Ok I have checked out your post using google chrome and now I see your graph there. I couldn't before. It's complete garbage which I will prove to you when I have a bit more time.
John Cook, the bloke who runs ''Skeptical'' science (actually they don't know the meaning of the word sceptical over there) is moron, alarmist cartoonist. I will get to him as well.
Sno
Mame
I liked looking at the pretty pictures .the one with the green stars is cool . You can actualy see when the aliens dropped there pyramids and changed everything .
Anthony
Imperial Masterpiece
Problems with solar power -
Manufacture - needs to be completely non-toxic
Old Batteries - to be non toxic
Re-cycle - to be non-toxic.
Chinese solar panels unreliable, die down here - Tropics
in two years.
Faulty everything.
Let you know about Wind Power as we start to use it.
So much to learn.
Good Day
Anthony
Manufacture - needs to be completely non-toxic
Old Batteries - to be non toxic
Re-cycle - to be non-toxic.
Chinese solar panels unreliable, die down here - Tropics
in two years.
Faulty everything.
Let you know about Wind Power as we start to use it.
So much to learn.
Good Day
Anthony
Anthony
Imperial Masterpiece
On-line information is mostly - FAKE!!
Remember my - 15 to 20 times weight in water = my proof
Or compost tea is fertiliser - ha ha ha
I still read publications on real paper
Not wiki-kicksee
Amthony
Remember my - 15 to 20 times weight in water = my proof
Or compost tea is fertiliser - ha ha ha
I still read publications on real paper
Not wiki-kicksee
Amthony
leatherback
The Treedeemer
Are you capable of not referring to name calling every single time you disagree with someone?
No. Not wikipedia.
so.. where is YOUR substance?
Forsoothe!
Imperial Masterpiece
Wind power works, but like everything else, there is a cost, several of them, actually. They are bird killers. The wind is unpredictable in most places and can only be useful as an adjunct. That's good, but you still need a steady source. Then there's the noise... whoomp... whoomp... whoomp... all day and all night when it works. The very personification of NIMB (not in my backyard). Other than that, there's the government subsidies. Does the government subsidize nuclear, natural gas or king coal? If it, or solar is so great, then it should be financed by the power supplying companies just like all other for-profit enterprises. Subsidies only hide real costs.
@Anthony, what makes you think that the print journalists are any different than the other liars?
@Anthony, what makes you think that the print journalists are any different than the other liars?
Anthony
Imperial Masterpiece
@Forsoothe! ,
the science magazine I read, is New Scientist, been around'
since I believe the 50's.
I am not much into black holes, but it is otherwise, interesting reading.
Did a check on them before I took a subscription, decent
reviews.
To be frank, I keep occupied and really don't have a lot of time
to be upset by the world changing faster and faster, plus I
tend to adapt.
AND if you want to see change.
Watch when folk had limited access to the Internet in the 90;'s
where you had to write with sense and maturity, images were
more or less non-existent on the forums.
Then images and tiny hand phones arrived.
The quality went down hill.
Good Day
Anthony
the science magazine I read, is New Scientist, been around'
since I believe the 50's.
I am not much into black holes, but it is otherwise, interesting reading.
Did a check on them before I took a subscription, decent
reviews.
To be frank, I keep occupied and really don't have a lot of time
to be upset by the world changing faster and faster, plus I
tend to adapt.
AND if you want to see change.
Watch when folk had limited access to the Internet in the 90;'s
where you had to write with sense and maturity, images were
more or less non-existent on the forums.
Then images and tiny hand phones arrived.
The quality went down hill.
Good Day
Anthony
amcoffeegirl
Masterpiece
I just wrote a long post and deleted it. Lol
No one cares about making the environment better. That’s fine we will perish in our own waste. How awesome?
No one cares about making the environment better. That’s fine we will perish in our own waste. How awesome?
leatherback
The Treedeemer
World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency
Scientists have a moral obligation to clearly warn humanity of any catastrophic threat and to “tell it like it is.” On the basis of this obligation and the
academic.oup.com
Signed by 11,258 liars from 153 countries each and everyone bought by big money from conservationists
Yep already heard one of the organizers talking about this this morning. Just more of the same old tired bullshit. Nothing new. Many of the so-called experts have nothing to do with atmospheric physics. They are bird experts, students, ecologists blah blah blah. Not liars. Just moronic sheep from an eco chamber. I dismiss it out of hand. It's all based on the same notion about a trace gas. Sorry, more verbal vomit to me.World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency
Scientists have a moral obligation to clearly warn humanity of any catastrophic threat and to “tell it like it is.” On the basis of this obligation and the
Signed by 11,258 liars from 153 countries each and everyone bought by big money from conservationists
That's not true coffeegirl. Most people do in fact care a lot about the environment. We have sewage being pumped into the sea, plastic pollution, particulate pollution in the air, deforestation, artificial hormone like substances in the food chain, wholesale erosion, habitat destruction and on and on. All these things are important but instead of attending to those we are spending trillions of dollars studying poor old co2, a natural trace gas which is basically plant food and the basis of all life. on this planet.
Have you even watched the videos on post 183 right through and understood them? That's my substance. Where's yours?