Female vs. Male California juniper

bonhe

Masterpiece
Messages
4,147
Reaction score
8,770
Location
Riverside, CA
USDA Zone
11
What is the difference? Bonhe

p/s: 2 pics taken on 2/21/09
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0496.jpg
    DSC_0496.jpg
    72 KB · Views: 118
  • DSC_0489.jpg
    DSC_0489.jpg
    71.8 KB · Views: 133
Male makes pollen, female makes flowers and berries if I remember correctly. At least, that is how it works with shimpaku.
 
if you wanna get all technical, there are no flowers :)

conifers make pollen-bearing cones and seed-bearing cones, sometimes on separate plants as seems to be the case with this juniper
 
Which one has the smaller, finer foliage?
I have seen some of Ernie Kuo's California junipers in which he pinched the foliage so well that they look compact almost like shimpaku's. I think he told me the male California junipers are better for pinching but I am not so sure I remember him correctly. Does anybody know?
Si
 
Which one has the smaller, finer foliage?
I have seen some of Ernie Kuo's California junipers in which he pinched the foliage so well that they look compact almost like shimpaku's. I think he told me the male California junipers are better for pinching but I am not so sure I remember him correctly. Does anybody know?
Si
With my observation, their foliage are the same except the female one has compact foliage. Because of it, the female one looks smooth! Bonhe
 
Bonhe, these photos illustrate how nature has adapted plants for pollination. The male foliage is more open to allow for wind dispersal of the pollen and the female carries most of her cones on the tips to optimize pollination.
 
Hi Snobird, it makes sense. Bonhe
 
I can't comment on Cal. junipers, but I do own 3 Rocky Mountain junipers, 2 male and 1 female. The female foliage is significantly finer in it's growth and texture as compared to the males. Granted, this comparison may be meaningless, as these trees may have been collected from different regions out west and may have regionally different growth patterns.

Dave
 
You can see the male one has longer spikes comparing to the female one. Pics were taken this am. Bonhe
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0943.jpg
    DSC_0943.jpg
    69.8 KB · Views: 60
  • DSC_0939.jpg
    DSC_0939.jpg
    71.4 KB · Views: 57
I can't comment on Cal. junipers, but I do own 3 Rocky Mountain junipers, 2 male and 1 female. The female foliage is significantly finer in it's growth and texture as compared to the males. Granted, this comparison may be meaningless, as these trees may have been collected from different regions out west and may have regionally different growth patterns.

Dave
Some people prefered female to male California juniper. Because of it, they need to differentiate them in collecting time. Bonhe
 
Some people prefered female to male California juniper. Because of it, they need to differentiate them in collecting time. Bonhe

I wasn't referring to the comparison of male to female juniper foliage as being meaningless...I actually prefer the finer female foliage out of the three trees I have. I was merely pointing out that my comparison of MY 3 trees might not have much meaning in that plants of the same species that are growing in different regions may have different morphological characteristics, including foliage growth and texture.

Dave
 
I hate to be showing my potential ignorance but this seems to me to be one of those issues akin to the King's new clothes. All of the research and refferences I have looked at out side what bonsai people are saying is the the California Juniper is monoecious, meaning that both sexs exist on the same tree:

http://www.calflora.net/bloomingplants/californiajuniper.html

So I am confused, which is it?
 
Last edited:
I was in doubt myself whether it is dioecious or monoecious but having no personal knowledge of the species I consulted the Gymnosperm database that states that California Juniper is largely dioecious. www.conifers.org/cu/ju/californica.htm
 
I was in doubt myself whether it is dioecious or monoecious but having no personal knowledge of the species I consulted the Gymnosperm database that states that California Juniper is largely dioecious. www.conifers.org/cu/ju/californica.htm

Actually it says it can be both but mostly dioecious as you have pointed out. This is puzzeling as well.
 
Back
Top Bottom