Two kinds of bonsai attitudes: Realists verses Traditionalists, or the Good Guys verses...

amcoffeegirl

Masterpiece
Messages
2,772
Reaction score
4,803
Location
IOWA
USDA Zone
5b
Yes, indeed. Art taken to an extreme is still art, but where is the fine line between beautiful and ugly? If it's in the eye of the beholder then we need to respect art that we don't like,
If there is ugly art or a tree in front of a person- well it is only on one side of you- you may simply look away.
Not all styles will appeal to all people. 🤷🏼‍♀️
 

leatherback

The Treedeemer
Messages
14,103
Reaction score
27,510
Location
Northern Germany
USDA Zone
7
Not that you will answer, but @Forsoothe! why this black and white thinking of yours, especially on this forum where I feel pretty much everyone can join in the conversation. Certainly not
Only true believers may opine.
Of course, it does not help if you refuse to believe to the other side.
we need to respect art that we don't like, and we need to respect those who don't like our version. It's a two-way street.
Which is why it is so strange to see people ignoring other people. A range of visions can only broaden the horizon. Blocking people and opinions come down to censorshi. As
Thomas Jefferson questioned
Over my dead body.
How many opinions are you ignoring?
 

BobbyLane

Imperial Masterpiece
Messages
6,064
Reaction score
17,725
Location
London, England
car·i·ca·ture

/ˈkerikəCHər,ˈkerikəˌCHo͝or/
noun: caricature; plural noun: caricatures
a picture, description, or imitation of a person in which certain striking characteristics are exaggerated in order to create a comic or grotesque effect.
"There are elements of caricature in the portrayal of the hero"
Similar: cartoon, distorted/exaggerated drawing, distortion, parody, satire, lampoon, burlesque, mimicry, travesty, farce, skit, squib, sendup, takeoff, spoof

pasquinade
a ludicrous or grotesque version of someone or something.
"he looked like a caricature of his normal self"
verb: caricature; 3rd person present: caricatures; past tense: caricatured; past participle: caricatured; gerund or present participle: caricaturing
make or give a comically or grotesquely exaggerated representation of (someone or something).
Similar: parody, satirize, lampoon, mimic, ridicule, mock

Yes, indeed. Art taken to an extreme is still art, but where is the fine line between beautiful and ugly? If it's in the eye of the beholder then we need to respect art that we don't like, and we need to respect those who don't like our version. It's a two-way street. Or is it? Thomas Jefferson questioned censorship, "...Whose foot is to be the measure to which ours are all to be cut or stretched?..."

There are guardians of the art in bonsai that demand obedience to a set of measurements that are not realistic, and insist that there is no true bonsai other than Japanese. Non-believers are illiterate, unskilled, etc. Only true believers may opine.

Over my dead body.
I do see this a bit. I do respect everyone's style and vision although it might not be my cup of tea but thats ok. you do get a sense in some quarters that if youre not doing it the Japanese way its not a good bonsai or its ok but not worthy because it has a hole in it, or a hollow trunk. mine is better because i was more patient and waited 10 years to heal a massive wound. 'ok'
But, the Japanese way isnt the only way and at least its not what i grew up on, nor was i taught it and nor was it the first style that i was endeared to. Nor did i grow up in Japan or had a Japanese teacher. We all take different routes, no one can persuade me to go down a path i dont want to. my bonsai is based on what i see in the landscape, not what i see in books.
with that said, i would like to have a bit of everything in my collection, i do see many people getting cubby holed into one way with no way out, which i find bizarre. isnt variety the spice of life, to me its odd that some folk only want to have one kind of tree in their collection. im pretty confident in my ability to produce scar less trees or trees with massive gaping hollows and holes. trees with multiple subtrunks or one defined trunk line, im confident that i can produce a 'bonsai' or a tree. i dont look at one as being better than the other, there are many paths to producing EQUALLY impressive bonsai.
 

ghues

Omono
Messages
1,554
Reaction score
3,141
Location
Campbell River BC Canada
USDA Zone
7b
Just a hobbyist here......no formal training. Really appreciate traditional Bonsai and the degree of perfection, the dedication and transformation of trees/shrubs in pots/containers. We all come to this from different backgrounds and life experiences which can form our ideas and perceptions of this art.
I come from a 40 year background in the Coastal PNW Forest industry as a Professional Forester....years of opportunities in the forests examining and studying not only Forest ecosystems but also individual tree species.... so I lean towards having my Bonsai look like real trees (naturalist perhaps) do I pull it off....hhhhhmmmm so subjective “eh”.
I do have trees that some may say fit into a more traditional Bonsai context....those I have tried to style without the influence of a real tree. The other benefit for me.... is the almost zen feeling/focus when applying the various bonsai tasks throughout the year....also my wife always knows where to find me 😂
 

River's Edge

Masterpiece
Messages
4,755
Reaction score
12,785
Location
Vancouver Island, British Columbia
USDA Zone
8b
So if Bonsai Nut implies an interest and connection to Bonsai.
And Bonsai is clearly a well known traditionally defined art form!
Actually for centuries with various cultural influences.

Should there be a forum for Realistic Nuts, or Naturalistic Nuts?
Surely they deserve equal opportunity to display their defined art form and explain the techniques and standards required to attain this art form.
It does seem unfair that they feel forced to join and participate within a group seemingly dedicated to differing objectives.

Would that not keep everyone happy?
Unless of course the purpose of this thread is simply misunderstood.
 

ShadyStump

Imperial Masterpiece
Messages
6,047
Reaction score
10,175
Location
Southern Colorado, USA
USDA Zone
6a
From the beginning I was already lost.
I like a good discussion, but I don't see the point in this one.
Some have accuse @Forsoothe! of taking a black and white view in this thread, and I'm of the thought that that is exactly to topic of discussion: how do some find their way to taking that one vs the other, black vs white, right vs wrong view of an incredibly diverse artform? I assumed from the get-go that his intent was to start a discussion that challenges that ideology.

Personally...
Art should move people. One way or the other.

View attachment 342573
... I'm this guy in the picture. No, you shouldn't be proud of the literal stump with half a sprig of green that you just dug up for the purpose of having something to put in a show. You didn't do anything, and it's as much art as a banana stuck to the wall with duct tape.
I don't care what you do to it, but it isn't art if you didn't put effort into it. Level of effort determines level of respect for the artist, but not necessarily the work of art itself. Respecting the art and respecting the artist are NOT mutually inclusive.
 

Clicio

Masterpiece
Messages
3,002
Reaction score
8,305
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
USDA Zone
11a
I still see no point about this conversation.
It's definitely not about art.
It's definitely not about horticulture.
Is it about "doing things differently"? Well, China has bonsai and penjing.
Taiwan has nice bonsai, and so have Vietnam, Indonesia, Italy, Spain, the UK and the USA.
Think Northern Europe. Australia. Chile.
All can be in many degrees close to the Japanese style or absolutely different from it.
Al can be very good.
We have good tropical bonsai in Brazil. Some try to make a BRT look like a pine (it's useless); others grow pines in the Japanese tradition.
But in all cases, apart from tropicals wired like pines, there are good bonsai and bad bonsai. Beautiful and ugly. Credible and grotesque.
I can understand the effort of the bonsaists that follow all the rules of design to create good bonsai in the Japanese tradition (which of course evolves with time also);
and I understand the approach people call "naturalist" to many tree species foreign to Japan that have NOT a "Japanese Style".
Both can be beautiful and can be considered living pieces of art.
In the end...
The "I AM RIGHT YOU ARE WRONG" discussion is the pointless one.
 

Wulfskaar

Omono
Messages
1,241
Reaction score
1,956
Location
Southern California
USDA Zone
10a
I, for one, appreciate this thread a lot. I think this is a great and healthy conversation to have for any art form.

There is absolute value in having an art form that has strict rules. This makes the art form live on with it's own identity and also makes judging contests a lot cleaner. There is nothing wrong with this.
However, there is also value in pushing an art form to new limits without such rules. This allows free expression and growth of the spirit.

As someone who has yet to reach noob status, I have learned from this forum that "bonsai" translates roughly to "tree in a pot". So, maybe the stricter Japanese style should be officially called "Traditional Japanese Bonsai", while any tree in any pot would be called a bonsai (probably a vast majority).

It's no different than painting. One guy follows the rules of realism, while another slaps paint on a wall with his hands while dancing. Both are paintings. Both might be exquisite work, but some of the strict realists would scoff at such buffoonery as dance painting because painting for 10 days or weeks is more impressive than 10 minutes and takes more detailed skill. Still, both are valid art forms.

I'm more of a Bob Ross type where we just have happy accidents. 🌲🌲


3163503-KWFZLTIA-7.jpg
55414623b7345.image.jpg
 

ShadyStump

Imperial Masterpiece
Messages
6,047
Reaction score
10,175
Location
Southern Colorado, USA
USDA Zone
6a
I don't consider a good or superb bonsai a happy accident.
And you are not @Wulfskaar, and his trees are not your trees, so you can consider it whatever you like.

Hell, I can barely keep trees alive, so I admire anyone who can make one into something pretty. I doubt even a tenth the population of Bnut can hold a candle to my homemade hot sauces that use all home grown ingredients, though. Or my pickled egg recipe, or my smoked poultry.
Someone just read all that and went 🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮 Does that mean they're the lowly uninitiated of the kitchen? No, it means they do baking, or something else that I don't because what I do does not appeal to them. And I can make bread, but you would all much prefer my soups. We can all agree the grandma's pasta sauce is always the best, just not always whose grandma, and we all respect that we're all biased.

I promise that many masters in Japan have had this exact conversation, making these exact arguments, and once or twice there was a penjing master from Vietnam watching them, thinking to himself, "what the hell are they arguing about? They're ALL doing it wrong anyway." And you don't want to know what the guy from China thought.
 
Top Bottom