Orion_metalhead
Masterpiece
You can have that phrase over the silhoettes of recognizable bonsai figures.
The Japanese are very traditional and poured into a mold type of people; not intending to be rude or anything like that. I have been studying bonsai for 60 some-odd years and I have read a lot from as many sources I can access. It seems that when Masahiko Kimura came along he so up-ended the traditional bonsai community that he was not accepted, or tolerated. It was the quality of his work that made them start to look at him albeit bith a very critical eye criticizing everything he does. It took some twenty or thirty years before his detractors realized that they were wrong and he was right. The Japanese bonsai we enjoy today are for the most part a modern invention, the styles exhibited today did not exist thirty yreas ago.Very poignant Vance. And I am in no way judging anyone or their techniques. I am simply pointing out that there is a very obvious logic to what Bjorn points out. Both hedging and the pinching vs pruning arguments seem to be a western debate. I have never been to Japan but I would bet there is no debate about it in Japan. As a new person I see lots of arguments by us westerners about technique, but it *appears to* always stem from wanting to differ from Japan's techniques. When tradition is in play there seems to be far less argument about how to make a tree. I certainly don't think Walter Pall is second rate anything. I will never be as good as him.
While much of what you say is true, Vance, it really doesn’t apply to this discussion. Kimura wasn’t/isn’t famous for his deciduous trees. Not that he can’t do them, but his forte is junipers and JWP.The Japanese are very traditional and poured into a mold type of people; not intending to be rude or anything like that. I have been studying bonsai for 60 some-odd years and I have read a lot from as many sources I can access. It seems that when Masahiko Kimura came along he so up-ended the traditional bonsai community that he was not accepted, or tolerated. It was the quality of his work that made them start to look at him albeit bith a very critical eye criticizing everything he does. It took some twenty or thirty years before his detractors realized that they were wrong and he was right. The Japanese bonsai we enjoy today are for the most part a modern invention, the styles exhibited today did not exist thirty yreas ago.
You wrote:While much of what you say is true, Vance, it really doesn’t apply to this discussion. Kimura wasn’t/isn’t famous for his deciduous trees. Not that he can’t do them, but his forte is junipers and JWP.
Also consider this: the Japanese are very good at taking a product/idea and building upon it, perfecting it. They took over the American automobile market by making cars better and cheaper than the American ones. If there’s a better way, they’ll find it and perfect it.
It seems like you are equating hedge pruning with naturalistic style trees and treating them as the same thing. Bjorn is very clear he is talking about a technique not a style. He is clear that although he prefers the traditional Japanese style many styles can be achieved from the technique he describes including the naturalistic style. In fact his criticism of hedge pruning is that it creates unnatural bulges and growth. I would think that would be undesirable for a naturalistic tree. I like Walter trees but from the videos I have seen him do he cleans up a lot of this bad growth during his winter pruning.Let's see if I can make heads or tails from this. I stated later my thoughts on Bjorn when it was brought out that he admitted that same thing can be accomplished but felt it more work from the technique Walter Pall uses. That's where I was done listening. That statement had me wonder why it was even up for discussion. People just choose to nitpick. Choose which appeals to you and do it. I don't understand why the need for saying there is only one way to skin a cat.
I do feel some may not understand that second part of hedge pruning and get a less desired look. But that falls at the feet of anyone practicing bonsai and are amateur.
Japanese don't like scars and such. The perfect tree they are after. That does take attention to details.
But I'm an Ohioan...I love the character I find on trails that show a tree has weathered storms. Those scars...appeal to me. I think that's why I am more into a tree that shows scars... not that I don't admire ones with out. I can and do admire them.
We recently switched to a smart TV. I'm not a huge TV Buff. My husband would love to switch the upstairs TV out for the smart TV. So he went to YouTube and put in Bonsai. Showed trees from Bjorn Worth $$$ . Amazing...well manicured pads. Absolutely stunning. Then we switched to Bonsai Empire...and then Walter Pall. The depth of carvings and such on deciduous trees and the powerful statements of trees that weathered the storm and survived. That makes my heart beat faster. That's just me. But what I LOVE about this hobby is there are so many styles that reach an audience of people...who can choose what they love. If one adores a well manicured poodle we don't chastise them...over say my home of English bulldogs. I also have an Aussie dog. She's GORGEOUS. Not one chastises me for my love of both breeds. So what I can't grasp is why one technique is wrong ...when Bjorn states (it can be achieved). More time...he goes to mention landscape in Japan. I'm sure no one goes back to those in the landscape and does the second step.
I mentioned grouper/Will. Because his trees speak of hardships. And they breathe life into ones who look at them. Naturalist style. If a tree can make one sit back and see something.
So where one can pick apart ones technique. Why does it have to be so opinionated?
Nature as a whole isn't perfect...those flaws in nature I sure don't plan on confronting God over when I meet him. Those very flaws...are $$$ in yamadori, even overlooked.
Not at all what I intended. It's just the first step method of the process ones have issues with. Walter Pall clearly states he goes in later to do work...as you clearly stated as well as you seen from his work.It seems like you are equating hedge pruning with naturalistic style trees and treating them as the same thing. Bjorn is very clear he is talking about a technique not a style. He is clear that although he prefers the traditional Japanese style many styles can be achieved from the technique he describes including the naturalistic style. In fact his criticism of hedge pruning is that it creates unnatural bulges and growth. I would think that would be undesirable for a naturalistic tree. I like Walter trees but from the videos I have seen him do he cleans up a lot of this bad growth during his winter pruning.
Walter Pall clearly states he goes in later to do work...as you clearly stated as well as you seen from his work.
I don't remember seeing anyone (at least in this thread) ignoring the fact that the fall/winter "clean up" is an important aspect of the technique. Maybe I missed those posts but I think we all get it.
The question remains, though - is there any benefit to this technique other than time saving in summer? I don't have enough deciduous trees to do a test that would have any validity.
I don't remember seeing anyone (at least in this thread) ignoring the fact that the fall/winter "clean up" is an important aspect of the technique. Maybe I missed those posts but I think we all get it.
The question remains, though - is there any benefit to this technique other than time saving in summer? I don't have enough deciduous trees to do a test that would have any validity.
I guess when you put it that wayi think you only have to look at Walter's trees and also the trees of his students, Marija and Andria zokic to see the benefits, its a no brainer!!!!
this is obviously a wind up!![]()
Masahiko Kimura It took some twenty or thirty years before his detractors realized that they were wrong and he was right.
this tree is very nice too and apparently without hedge pruningi think you only have to look at Walter's trees and also the trees of his students, Marija and Andria zokic to see the benefits, its a no brainer!!!!
this is obviously a wind up!![]()
"Adair M, post: 701595, member: 13405"]
What would you call a guy who styled a tree that wins a Kokufu prize? How about a guy who has styled a tree that wins the Prime Minister Award?
Maters of technique but not necessarily masters of bonsai (my definition as I mentioned earlier)
Maybe this will explain my personal point of view.... This is getting a bit off the topic but you asked...
Check out these two needle junipers. The first one is what you would call a masters work and capable of winning Kokufu if it hasn't already. The second one would never make it there the way things are currently. I don't need to go into the details of how much work was put into the first one because you already know. However, after looking at the whole trees, take a closer look at the detail of the right side. The second tree shows me a true master work. Look at the shaggy bark at it's base. Look at the intentional roughness of the small branches and needles and then look at the polished ''hedged'' monstrosity above it. Take your time and look deeply. Restraint! Something we don't often see but which is extremely important to me and others seeking the true spirit of bonsai. If you ask yourself this simple question while placing yourself ''into'' the tree, - which one makes you feel the wind blowing and the birds singing? You gotta know when to leave things and stop over-working the tree. It is EXTREMELY difficult to do because 1, we can't help ourselves and 2, we fear the response of out peers.
Now think about the word ''master'' again........
View attachment 275302
View attachment 275303
View attachment 275304
View attachment 275305
Actually, I still prefer the first one, birds be damned. Just a matter of personal preference, as it is yours. And one cannot argue taste. Para gustos, colores, as they say in Spain.Maters of technique but not necessarily masters of bonsai (my definition as I mentioned earlier)
Maybe this will explain my personal point of view.... This is getting a bit off the topic but you asked...
Check out these two needle junipers. The first one is what you would call a masters work and capable of winning Kokufu if it hasn't already. The second one would never make it there the way things are currently. I don't need to go into the details of how much work was put into the first one because you already know. However, after looking at the whole trees, take a closer look at the detail of the right side. The second tree shows me a true master work. Look at the shaggy bark at it's base. Look at the intentional roughness of the small branches and needles and then look at the polished ''hedged'' monstrosity above it. Take your time and look deeply. Restraint! Something we don't often see but which is extremely important to me and others seeking the true spirit of bonsai. If you ask yourself this simple question while placing yourself ''into'' the tree, - which one makes you feel the wind blowing and the birds singing? You gotta know when to leave things and stop over-working the tree. It is EXTREMELY difficult to do because 1, we can't help ourselves and 2, we fear the response of out peers.
Now think about the word ''master'' again........
View attachment 275302
View attachment 275303
View attachment 275304
View attachment 275305
I feel like I've seen the first tree (or a similar version of it) dozens of times at least, at bonsai exhibitions, in books, etc. The second one though is different from most bonsai, less stylized, not as manicured. That is refreshing to me.Maters of technique but not necessarily masters of bonsai (my definition as I mentioned earlier)
Maybe this will explain my personal point of view.... This is getting a bit off the topic but you asked...
Check out these two needle junipers. The first one is what you would call a masters work and capable of winning Kokufu if it hasn't already. The second one would never make it there the way things are currently. I don't need to go into the details of how much work was put into the first one because you already know. However, after looking at the whole trees, take a closer look at the detail of the right side. The second tree shows me a true master work. Look at the shaggy bark at it's base. Look at the intentional roughness of the small branches and needles and then look at the polished ''hedged'' monstrosity above it. Take your time and look deeply. Restraint! Something we don't often see but which is extremely important to me and others seeking the true spirit of bonsai. If you ask yourself this simple question while placing yourself ''into'' the tree, - which one makes you feel the wind blowing and the birds singing? You gotta know when to leave things and stop over-working the tree. It is EXTREMELY difficult to do because 1, we can't help ourselves and 2, we fear the response of out peers.
Now think about the word ''master'' again........
View attachment 275302
View attachment 275303
View attachment 275304
View attachment 275305