Winter Silhouette Exhibit Discussion Page

Adair M

Pinus Envy
Messages
14,402
Reaction score
34,906
Location
NEGeorgia
USDA Zone
7a
I certainly understand the idea behind both, I just feel like in miniature, trying to evoke a viewpoint from within a forest is not possible. Based on the above pictures would you say that the primary difference is the location of the “mother” tree? Obviously there is more to it than that but simply put, adjusting the location of the mother tree would change the feeling of the composition? So if goshin had 2-3 more trees added that filled up the foreground a bit, while still maintaining excellent balance would that portray a far view forest? And vice versa for your other examples?
Yes, if Goshin had some small trees positioned between the large tree and the viewer, then it would be a “far view” forest.
 

PeaceLoveBonsai

Chumono
Messages
892
Reaction score
3,005
Location
Franklin, TN
USDA Zone
7a
Those of you with scrolls, what are some online options for buying scrolls? Any trusted sellers out there in the US?
 

Smoke

Ignore-Amus
Messages
11,668
Reaction score
20,730
Location
Fresno, CA
USDA Zone
9
Those of you with scrolls, what are some online options for buying scrolls? Any trusted sellers out there in the US?
For me the online options change monthly according to supply. The big problem for us in the USA is a question I was going to ask @William N. Valavanis after seeing the Tokonoma in the selling area setting. All these years of reading his magazine and seeing trees in that Tokonoma I had no idea how short the viewing area is. What do I mean by that, well the viewing area is only about three feet tall, maybe 40 inches or so. Just judging.

So When I started to buy Japanese scrolls to display in the yearly Kazari in the Japanese Museum in Hanford I bought from the Japanese what was sold. Most of the scrolls are old and used and 6 feet in length or more.

DSC_0055.JPGDSC_00690069.JPGDSC_00740074.JPG

Now we have the Kazari in the central valley Collection and they are outdoor portable Tokonoma's and not nearly as tall as before.

DSC_0090.JPG

So now when I do the displays at home and my viewing area is much like what Tom B. and Bill are showing, in a tabletop display area, you need a much shorter scroll. Maybe in the 30 inch catagory. Bill travels to Japan a lot. He is able to hand pick his subjects and size. It is not very easy at all to do that over the internet. You have to choose from what is available and that is very hard.

I have about thirty or more and all from Japan via ebay. They are hard to find for display because they have to be limited in subject matter and be short enough for table top display.

Good luck.
DSC_0055.JPG
 

Smoke

Ignore-Amus
Messages
11,668
Reaction score
20,730
Location
Fresno, CA
USDA Zone
9
Oh and here is what some of that simple display themes should look like on a scroll for bonsai display. Simple. just a bird on a branch, a fox or rabbit according to season, a waterfall, or just the sun. One flower and a stem or a vine and cherry blossoms, maybe just a moon or some dry grass. when the scroll becomes too busy with mountains, and trees and buildings and old Chinese guys with beards and robes, it becomes the center of attentiona rather that a contributing element to the display.

I displayed and allowed Kathy Shaner to do a display workshop at the museum with an assortment of my scrolls from home..

DSC_00890089.JPGDSC_00900090.JPG
 
Messages
584
Reaction score
3,248
Location
Rochester, NY USA
USDA Zone
5-6
NEAR VIEW & DISTANT VIEW FORESTS
Like any style of bonsai, the beauty of the total aesthetic impact is most important. The emotional beauty the viewer feels differs from individual to individual. Generally, when viewing a bonsai a viewer does not think “That’s a good cascade style I can see it struggling to grow out of cliff” or “That forest looks like a near view form because I can see myself standing in front of the trees”. Beauty of the composition is paramount, not necessarily the label of the style.

Classifying bonsai is not important when appreciating bonsai. Some people like a composition and others may not. Although personal evaluation of a bonsai depends on the individual it is important to consider the source. Some people are not familiar with bonsai or are just beginning do not have the experience to back up their thoughts and rash statements. There are many different levels of bonsai appreciation. Beginners may see beauty (especially when voting for a “people’s choice award”) while an experienced professional trained bonsai artist may see something vastly different depending on their background and form of bonsai they practice.

However, as a bonsai educator with over 50 years of experience I have learned that there are some guidelines necessary to teach and to assist students how to create and design their own bonsai. Just arranging trees in a container haphazardly does not mean the composition is good or acceptable to people familiar with bonsai. They may like the forest as is and appreciate it, which is fine and good. As long as they like their work, its good. However, if one wants to improve their design, some guidelines are required. That’s where the bonsai educator comes in handy.

Classifying a bonsai forest as a near view or distant view is an important teaching aid when trying to help others enjoy the art.

Yes, I’m quite familiar with Saburo Kato’s book Forest, Rock Planting & Ezo Spruce Bonsai. I was the one who compiled and edited the text. I’ve known the Kato family for 50 years now, Saburo Kato, his brothers, his sons and grandson. I doubt if Mr. Kato ever sat down and said I’m going to design a distant view forest. Like many artists Mr. Kato created from his heart, depending on the material used. He was quite skilled in both distant and near view forests, usually using evergreens. On the other hand, Fusazo Taeyama and his son Hiroshi, specialized in deciduous, unusual and forest bonsai. But they tended to create distant view deciduous forests. The two Trident Maple forests illustrated in Post 40 were created by Mr. Takeyama.

As stated, generally near view forests have fewer trees with large heavy trunks with often the main heavy tree in the foreground. Distant view forests generally have more trees in the composition, with thinner trunks and the main tree in the center of the composition. Near view forests are primarily appreciated for their trunks and branches. Distant view forests are usually appreciated for their silhouettes and twigs, not necessarily individual trunk shapes.

Below are two forests. The first near view style was created by Saburo Kato using Ezo spruce he collected. The second distant view forest was created by me using Chinese elm seedlings and is appreciated for the fine twigs.

No matter what you name a bonsai, please remember the most important aspect is the true beauty of the composition and how it moves you.

Bill
SPRUCE NEAR VIEW.JPG
CHINESE ELM DISTANT VIEW.JPG
 

Arcto

Chumono
Messages
863
Reaction score
1,447
Location
PNW
Timely thread as I was at the Pacific Bonsai Museum the other day. Here are a few.
0B375BFA-E3CC-44C0-B25A-7DD0230D18CB.jpeg
3FA17D0A-BE3F-4F68-AA17-6D0B80E81B82.jpeg

Since there has been some discussion of Forest plantings, here are a couple more.
D7D1EFB5-BD7E-4090-A52E-E8A5C4ADD077.jpeg

99881B8C-D623-421D-987A-8A8FB672FBC3.jpeg
 

Djtommy

Omono
Messages
1,551
Reaction score
5,368
Location
Tokyo
When I was hiking in a forest, at one point the scenery very much made me think of Kimuras famous hinoki slanted slap forest . I guess that makes that composition a near view.
 
Top Bottom