To borrow a phrase, "I do not think that word means what you think it means"scientific consensus
At one time the scientific consensus was that that the world was flat and if you sailed too far West you would fall off the edge of the Earth. At one time the scientific consensus was that the human body could not take the strain from going faster than 25 MPH. Scientific Consensus claimed that the Moon was made of green cheese. Scientific Consensus claimed that the Earth was the Center of the Solar System, that the Earth was the center of the Universe, that the Earth was only six thousand years old. Just because something has Scientific Consensus does not mean it is either accurate or correct, it just means that a bunch of people believe the same thing and have been able to cow those who do not into not complaining about it. Four-Hundred years ago you could excommunicated for not believing what the Scientific Consensus spouted by the Church said. Today you get labeled in any number of ways, that could cost you respect or even employment.
It's not the planet's fault. We will likely kill ourselves off before the planet does, because we believe so many wrong headed things as fact and are willing to take them to the extreme to prove ourselves right.At some point you have to believe experts in any given field, if for no other reason than we don't have the time or expertise to do all the experiments and observations ourselves. You can choose to ignore them if you wish but that won't change physics. In the end, the only thing we can try to moderate climate change is altering human activity.....or we do nothing and see what happens. Life on this planet will survive. Humans may not.
According to you one has to be a Democrat to understand Bovine Scatology.
You very well may be right, one has to be a Democrat to understand the Brothers Grimm predictions of climate change. However can you tell me why it is "You Guys, that subscribers to Bovine Scatology International" who think that they have to resort to personal insults and destruction of character in an attempt to win an argument?
Our weather here has been becoming cooler for years. I don't argue that the climate may be changing but I despute that our activity is 100% responsible for it. No one is siting activity of the Sun or the inclination of the Earth in realtion to the Sun. All of which can cause climate change. So----Who caused the warm up during the age of Dinosaurs or the cool down during the several Ice ages----my ignorance? How about the warm up that ended the Ice Ages, and how about the warm up that ended the Ice Ball Earth that is one of the recent cause celebs of climate understanding? All of that stuff happened before Human activity could have an effect on anything????
According to you one has to be a Democrat to understand Bovine Scatology.
You very well may be right, one has to be a Democrat to understand the Brothers Grimm predictions of climate change. However can you tell me why it is "You Guys, that subscribers to Bovine Scatology International" who think that they have to resort to personal insults and destruction of character in an attempt to win an argument?
Our weather here has been becoming cooler for years. I don't argue that the climate may be changing but I despute that our activity is 100% responsible for it. No one is siting activity of the Sun or the inclination of the Earth in realtion to the Sun. All of which can cause climate change. So----Who caused the warm up during the age of Dinosaurs or the cool down during the several Ice ages----my ignorance? How about the warm up that ended the Ice Ages, and how about the warm up that ended the Ice Ball Earth that is one of the recent cause celebs of climate understanding? All of that stuff happened before Human activity could have an effect on anything????
It has always been the Democrats that have embraced almost anything that supports the destruction of the economy and way of life that has made America great, and accepted junk science that seems to support their point of view.I wasn't trying to insult. I was merely trying to point out the fact that it has been Republicans who have chosen to willfully ignore the science, only for political and economic reasons. By choosing to vilify science and scientists, they put us all at risk. And that is not only insulting, it is downright irresponsible, to say the least.
It is funny to me how I can spend hours detailing a lot of things about bonsai, and share it here ungrudgingly and generate but few comments. Let me mention one little thing about the environment or politics and the wrath of the intellectuals comes down on me from people I seldom hear from like a Monsoon storm. None of you are going to change my mind about almost anything.
Gee, that must suck....
Well this is the hand we are being dealt weather wise this week. Should be interesting.View attachment 149676
It has always been the Democrats that have embraced almost anything that supports the destruction of the economy and way of life that has made America great, and accepted junk science that seems to support their point of view.
I have to agree with Vance, first, what does this have to do with bonsai? Second, global warming is cyclic for the Earth, thoughout its existance, it has heated and cooled. Third, more carbon and it's compounds are released by the Earth itself than by man. Fourth, most of this global warming comes from wannabe scientists whoring themselves out to get government grants to study their new global threat. If they ever admitted that the evidence showed that there was no problem, guess what, no money.