larlamonde
Shohin
Just ordered the book!
Thanks! Glad you liked the illustrations. Yes my background is in graphic design and illustration. When Michael and I discussed the chapters to be illustrated, we originally wanted to have a lot more but it proved to be way beyond his budget. So we ended with 13 illustrations plus the cover.
Here is a quick look at behind the scenes. Many ideas were discussed and even executed in the process only to edit them to the final 13 illustrations. The cover was probably the only image that Michael had a very specific idea of what he wanted it to be.
Pencil sketches were first done and submitted for concept approval. Afterwards they were all digitally painted in a program called Procreate. Some you may recognize while others changed completely in their final versions.
View attachment 302168
View attachment 302172
View attachment 302177
View attachment 302180
View attachment 302165
View attachment 302183
View attachment 302182
Amazing work. Some of them are reminiscent of Robert Crumb, with a little Ralph Steadman thrown in for good measure.
Thanks for the detailed walk through. the cutting room floor sketches are still top notch. Never used procreate but figured it was a vector type graphics package. Always said if I did it all over I would have been a graphic designer or industrial design student. Went to Georgia Tech and most of my friends were that or architecture majors. I went into industrial engineering. Glad you had the opportunity to contribute.
Then how is this bonsai herasy? Many and legion are those who think Akadama can raise the dead.I just read through the first section on media. He gives strong support of akadama, and reasons why.
Many who downplay akadama say so because it breaks down, turns to mush, and becomes compacted over time. Hagedorn says yes, that is true, but for some inexplicable reason, it grows fine roots in the core of the root ball. Some people see this mushy or compacted akadama and immediately rush to clean out the core of their root balls, when they should in fact be leaving it alone. This is not so much heresy as supporting the use of modern inorganic media, as all informed bonsai practitioners now do. I thought akadama was clay, but Hagedorn says it's volcanic in origin, just like lava and pumice. He says that trees grown in lava/pumice/akadama will support healthy root growth for years before repotting is needed. He actually likes that hard interior root mass, because he says it's full of fine root growth.Then how is this bonsai herasy? Many and legion are those who think Akadama can raise the dead.
I also picked up the Juniper Master's Series from Stone Lantern when I purchased Bonsai Heresy, and was really disappointed in how out of date most of the information is.
Yes. It was published in 2007. A lot has changed in bonsai horticulture in the last 13 years.Is that the one written by Wayne?
Those Pine and Juniper Master Series books were collections of articles previously published by Bonsai Today...which were translated from the Japanese Kinbon magazine.Is that the one written by Wayne?
Is the content still valid though? Previous posts seem to indicate.. not really?Those Pine and Juniper Master Series books were collections of articles previously published by Bonsai Today...which were translated from the Japanese Kinbon magazine.
Sure, but the articles are written by several different authors and cover a range of different topics, so some of the information can be a bit conflicting. I don’t recall any content that isn’t still valid. it’s also important to note that these articles are from the late 80s-early 90s, and the trend was perfectly manicured pads, tightly wired branches, heavily carved trunks, and bright white bleached deadwood. The trend has relaxed a bit now to a slightly more natural look. I have seen interviews showing Kobiyashi has moved to the wild end of the spectrum, and Fujikawa is still on the manicured end. Both still ”valid”, just a matter of personal preference.Is the content still valid though? Previous posts seem to indicate.. not really?
has so much really changed?
I only got a short way into the book, and they were already advocating use of organics in soil and pinching off all the buds a juniper has produced with fingertips. I was so disappointed I almost threw it in the garbage, but I figured I'd give it another try after I finish Hagedorn's book. This book should be sold for it's historical value, not for any modern practical value.Sure, but the articles are written by several different authors and cover a range of different topics, so some of the information can be a bit conflicting. I don’t recall any content that isn’t still valid. it’s also important to note that these articles are from the late 80s-early 90s, and the trend was perfectly manicured pads, tightly wired branches, heavily carved trunks, and bright white bleached deadwood. The trend has relaxed a bit now to a slightly more natural look. I have seen interviews showing Kobiyashi has moved to the wild end of the spectrum, and Fujikawa is still on the manicured end. Both still ”valid”, just a matter of personal preference.
There may be some problems with translation in these articles as well. I think those Japanese Kinbon articles were translated to Spanish, and then to English, in Spain by non-bonsai people, for use in the Bonsai Today magazine. If you read closely, you will find captions that don’t match the photos from time to time.
As @Brian Van Fleet said, these articles are from the 80s and 90s. Bonsai horticulture has changed greatly since then.Is the content still valid though? Previous posts seem to indicate.. not really?
has so much really changed?
Thanks! Glad you liked the illustrations. Yes my background is in graphic design and illustration. When Michael and I discussed the chapters to be illustrated, we originally wanted to have a lot more but it proved to be way beyond his budget. So we ended with 13 illustrations plus the cover.
Here is a quick look at behind the scenes. Many ideas were discussed and even executed in the process only to edit them to the final 13 illustrations. The cover was probably the only image that Michael had a very specific idea of what he wanted it to be.
Pencil sketches were first done and submitted for concept approval. Afterwards they were all digitally painted in a program called Procreate. Some you may recognize while others changed completely in their final versions.
View attachment 302168
View attachment 302172
View attachment 302177
View attachment 302180
View attachment 302165
View attachment 302183
View attachment 302182