M. Frary
Bonsai Godzilla
I like the trees.
I like the trees.
I am not going to say anyone is right or wrong in their opinions of liking or disliking these installations, but to say it is not Bonsai because it wasn't presented in a traditional way? That seems to be the general theme most are getting to and that is just... Sad to me. Any human endeavor- be it art, teaching, parenting, business... Is about learning from the past and advancing in the future. If only one static presentation is "allowed" in Bonsai, then it truly IS A DEAD ART FORM. The trees are he focus, butt if you take note this artist included all the technical details of traditional display- the Accent plants, the relationship of the accents to the main plant, the overall symmetry seems right on, and with most he included an image in the background which in some ways are comparable to a scroll... Just more dynamic.., he expanded on that "traditional display" by creating complicated shelves- rather than just the polished wood standard in classical displays.. He incorporated some 3-D elements with the hands and people... All added to the overall image though... Accentuating or mimicking the movements of the trees, or telling a story about the techniques used to train it, or the artists/ viewers feeling of longing for the main object (the tree)... In each display, the trees ARE the focal point. To say they are lost or that the images distract from them? I don't get that at all. If anything these images and sculptures frame and bring added attention to certain elements of the Bonsai. This is a progression of the art form if you ask me... It is similar to comparing classic portraits to a modern day digitally created multi-medium prints... Both are "visual arts"- could be described similarly as 2 dimensional "paintings" in a general sense. Is one NOT a painting because some elements were photography, some were printed from a PC, some were hand drawn/ painted... Does that DETRACT from the image? No. It is ART, there are no RULES. Rules are the antithesis of creativity... To stifle Bonsai as something that must follow certain rules or it is cannot be called Bonsai any longer is detrimental to the progression of the art form.
Like it, or hate it- that is your opinion... But I don't think any of us get to say whether it is or is not Bonsai. Personally.. I like a couple of these, but I really do not like a few as well. That is the great thing about art though- it means different things to different people- truly and "eye of the beholder" experience.
I think you're being a bit overly sensitive and a bit of a reverse bonsai snob.I am not going to say anyone is right or wrong in their opinions of liking or disliking these installations, but to say it is not Bonsai because it wasn't presented in a traditional way? That seems to be the general theme most are getting to and that is just... Sad to me. Any human endeavor- be it art, teaching, parenting, business... Is about learning from the past and advancing in the future. If only one static presentation is "allowed" in Bonsai, then it truly IS A DEAD ART FORM. The trees are he focus, butt if you take note this artist included all the technical details of traditional display- the Accent plants, the relationship of the accents to the main plant, the overall symmetry seems right on, and with most he included an image in the background which in some ways are comparable to a scroll... Just more dynamic.., he expanded on that "traditional display" by creating complicated shelves- rather than just the polished wood standard in classical displays.. He incorporated some 3-D elements with the hands and people... All added to the overall image though... Accentuating or mimicking the movements of the trees, or telling a story about the techniques used to train it, or the artists/ viewers feeling of longing for the main object (the tree)... In each display, the trees ARE the focal point. To say they are lost or that the images distract from them? I don't get that at all. If anything these images and sculptures frame and bring added attention to certain elements of the Bonsai. This is a progression of the art form if you ask me... It is similar to comparing classic portraits to a modern day digitally created multi-medium prints... Both are "visual arts"- could be described similarly as 2 dimensional "paintings" in a general sense. Is one NOT a painting because some elements were photography, some were printed from a PC, some were hand drawn/ painted... Does that DETRACT from the image? No. It is ART, there are no RULES. Rules are the antithesis of creativity... To stifle Bonsai as something that must follow certain rules or it is cannot be called Bonsai any longer is detrimental to the progression of the art form.
Like it, or hate it- that is your opinion... But I don't think any of us get to say whether it is or is not Bonsai. Personally.. I like a couple of these, but I really do not like a few as well. That is the great thing about art though- it means different things to different people- truly and "eye of the beholder" experience.
It's not that it's just as - as I said - that in these installations you could replace the trees by a stuff teddy bear and they still all work (really, try to picture it and you'll see that it's work, essentially the last one with a beheaded Teddy his head lying on the ground at his left side).
You do that (put a Teddy bear), show these displays in an Art gallery and called the exhibit 'Bonsaifying Teddy' and it will be a great show. Nuts like us will see the 'making a bonsai action' behind, random viewers will see whatever they want to see and that's quite fine.
So in this installations the tree is in fact secondary, that's why it's not really bonsai anymore because in bonsai normally if you replace the tree by a Teddy bear that doesn't work at all (or that works but in this case it's conceptual art and it becomes something like 'what if trees were stuffed?' or 'the pollution may drives us to plant stuffed bears in place of the trees' or something like that.
You could actually show your traditionally displayed teddy bears in a bonsai show, you'll have a riot and that really fine because this too is art.
Also: even if the display is traditional that doesn't mean that the art is dead btw. It's just means that the tree being the art the art evolves with the way we work on the tree, or invent a new style (good luck with this one as all styles could already be combine, it will be like trying to invent a new opening in a chess game).
Last point: bonsai has no meaning, it's just a freaking tree! A tree doesn't mean anything, it's just beautiful.
All these installations have a meaning or try to say something, so once again another form of art.
But that doesn't mean that it's not nice and that people can't love it
I think you're being a bit overly sensitive and a bit of a reverse bonsai snob.
Just because it's not really bonsai, doesn't mean it's not art. It's not that this isn't ALLOWED to be bonsai. It's NOT really in the same wabi-sabi, bonsai-no-kokoro spirit as the traditional form. It's more modernistic and industrial, where traditional bonsai is more archaic and natural.
Taste is hard to pin down. While some think its wonderful, I think it's a bit strained and crass, but that's me. Art is subject to all manner of critique. Being upset because someone doesn't see the same thing as you is futile.
So, replacing the tree in pic one with a teddy bear works?... Because kids generally play with teddy bears with a set of bonsai shears on their hands and a spool of copper wire in The other? I don't see any of that when I look at these installations. I think the "extra" just stands out because it is not what people are used to seeing, but that doesn't mean the tree is not the focus. The direction of the extra elements tends to mimic the movement of the tree, the added images and 3D pieces frame the trees, and it all still focuses on the tree.
EXACTLYWell said. When people look at these new and different pieces of work and dismiss them as "not even bonsai", they remind me of the old curmudgeons in the 1950s who listened to rock music on the radio and grumbled that it "wasn't even music, just noise." These sort of different displays attract people's interest. And attracting people's interest, particularly young people's interest, is important if we want this hobby to do anything other than wither and die.
Well said. When people look at these new and different pieces of work and dismiss them as "not even bonsai", they remind me of the old curmudgeons in the 1950s who listened to rock music on the radio and grumbled that it "wasn't even music, just noise." These sort of different displays attract people's interest. And attracting people's interest, particularly young people's interest, is important if we want this hobby to do anything other than wither and die.
EXACTLY
From what I have read of Bonsai in Japan, it basically IS dying off because very few young people are getting involved. Thought still a big deal compared to the US in many ways, it seems mostly old men are practicing it now and their refusal to allow anything other than the EXACT SAME THING into the hobby and the shows is alienating to most young people I am sure. It doesn't have to be THIS installation the tickles your fancy... But I think the value of getting other mediums involved in this art form could be huge. Creating a wider appeal and a larger segment of the arts community that can get involved is just going to help bolster Bonsai as a growing "hobby"/ art form in this country which will lead to more people practicing, better trees, better shows, more materials available for purchase... An exponential effect that could help most of us. I know there are plenty who say they don't care if it grows.. Well, what if every Bonsai nursery just shut down in the US due to lack of sales/ interest? Would you care then? It is not a self-sustaining past time by any means...
Absolutely. You know why? Because it's fun. If you ever have the chance to go to a show where they permit something a little different, just stand back and watch the interest. In particular, watch who is interested.
Ok, why not, but anyway I'm pretty sure that bonsai has always been an old fellow art. The amount of time, patience, money, space, knowledge and so on require and I'm sure that except few young fellows (and the young fellows that were born in a family that traditionally does bonsai) all the other ones are old guys.
I found over the years that people who demand that their idea of bonsai be taken "seriously" are more about being accepted as part of the very thing they're so critical of.
Sorry, but that's just plain old crap....Btw: did you know that an artist once took a dump in a can and exposed that in a gallery in NY, it was entitled 'Artist's poop'
Art? Yes.
Have you noticed that most of the time, when one of the old masters or old club members passes away, there is an estate sale? Ever stop to ponder the significance of that? Even the children and grandchildren of the great masters are uninterested in it and they just cash out. That's good for individuals looking to pick up a piece or two at the sale, but in the long run, it's bad for the hobby.