Poink88
Imperial Masterpiece
... given the availability and ease of production, I think it could mitigate the downside that the lifetime of the pot presents. When you start thinking in terms of quality wooden pots, it would be much easier for almost anyone to find someone in their area that could built the pot given the specifications. This would also mean the pot would be cheaper and therefore easily replaceable. .... It may even make pot-making to be in the range of more artists themselves. And instead of paying large sums of money for this one of a kind pot, it's within range to now even replicate this pot many times over.
...I'm just wondering if there is a mid-range pot between a grow box and a high quality ceramic pot. Something that looks nice and is affordable, and can scale easily to accomodate larger bonsai without the cost going up exponentially.
Points to consider.
1. We are in the USA. Labor is expensive.
2. Material cost is usually negligible in the grand schema especially if you have to replace it in the long run.
Your belief of cheaper pot and ease of production is okay for a box...once you add quality to the mix...the savings is gone because it equates to time ...lots of it and not by a regular carpenter but an artistic one.
It is like asking for a cheaper paint that you have to re-coat in a few years vs one that will last twice as long but twice as expensive. The math looks okay but once you factor the cost of the painter you realize you are almost paying twice with the cheaper paint.
Sorry, I'd rather have a cheap yixing Chinese pot (probably cheaper) than a wooden one anytime.
That said, feel free to use wooden pots anytime.