Yes, the thread I posted a while back was in regards to how it seems that much of the material being worked on today by master artists are all beautful yamadori with amazing potential. Nothing wrong with that and that is great and expected. I was just recalling how about 10 plus years ago, it seemed that lesser quality stock was used more often. It was not a positive or negative issue or anything that required an opinion. It was just something I seemed to notice.
I can only explain it by 10 plus years ago, I would estimate that maybe 60% was top notch material and the rest of the work was on young or sub par material. Today, I would say that it is about 90 top notch material and barely 10 percent stock that is considered long term or very problematic.
Rob
		
		
	 
I would agree... 
For me, there is so much better material available now then when
I first started... The nursuries that I have gone to for years, themselves
have grown, and are so much better than when I first went to them...
Now side note... One of the things I was trying to get at with my initial
thread post, was that some of our styling techniques have changed as well.
For me... this top notch material would still be really sub-par, if I was 
styling how I used to style when padding everything up.
This is not to say that I am not still doing losse pads here and there, but
my approach now is more in the designing of the "Silhouette" of the tree.
Bringing bended and twisting branches from one side of the
tree to another... a feat which makes some of the "Old-Timers" cringe,
I know... But these are what "actual" real trees do...
so I think when one talks about sub-par material... years ago when one
didn't have a branch where one needs it, they would just try and grow one...
Now we just bend over one from some where else...
