I just went back and scanned through the entire thread. Several have offered reasons for using the top cut technique as opposed to the bottom cut method, but I didn't see anyone claiming that cutting on the top is stronger. Just that there might be situations where it would be preferred (more natural appearance perhaps, avoiding cutting of veins, etc).
As for your demonstration...I'm not going to argue the point about manufactured foam board versus wood, but the demonstration falls far short in that it does not account for the healing of the wound. A cut from above may always be weaker than a cut from below for the situation when a force is applied to the branch from above. But, in my mind, the question is not is it weaker, but is it so much weaker that it is likely to be a problem in the future? I seriously doubt either branch will be damaged severely if someone drops a roll of masking tape on it 5 years down the road. Now maybe if someone forgets (or is unaware) about the top cut, and tries to pull the branch down further it might split again at the crotch, I don't know. But when I see long time experienced professionals using the technique, it tells me that it is a very valid approach.
Chris
If you read post #54 John says that it will be safer when one goes to wire branches...
Which is why I did the vid.
I never said the top is not doable... quite the contrary, I have done this... I didn't put a
Rock or stone or a piece of bamboo in the hole created... but, I do have
The branches that were done this way and they are wobbly, and no future
Bending can be done on them. So, then my question would be and has been since the
Beginning, why if then we are arguing cosmetics of the look of how they heal, would you
Choose a path where you are limiting yourself to no longer being able to do any future
Work on the branch ? This kinda just screws you from future development. And I clearly
Stated previously that I have these branches and I have the problem that I am saying arised
From this and now I am stuck... my only path forward is actual removal of the branch. Which
Sucks, and I think this is not clearly being addressed... I am not going to endorse a technique
and tell people to do this and send them down the same road I am now at, when I know for an
Actual fact, seeing that I have done both... that the procedure I suggested this does not happen.
And yes one can easily bend down the branch further at any time without an issue.
If I need to provide a video of my branches, where with the touch of a finger I can easily bend
Them down and quite scarily open up the wound to the point of practically breaking, I can,
And would be happy to do so.
If you choose to bend branches this way, then fine, do it... I am not telling anyone here not too...
I have only suggested because I actually have done this and I not just guessing... that I have
Had problems with this and ill side effects and will not endorse a product that I see is flawed.
I don't do that to people. I don't recommend things I think are incorrect, and I don't
Go around telling folks it is ok to do something I haven't even done. If others want too, then
Have at it.
I don't see any point in me adding to this discussion any further. As you said, there
Are professional people who don't do this and there are ones that do... decide for
Yourself. I am not a professional, so what I say clearly doesn't matter anyways. Everyone
Has clearly made up their mind even though most have either not done it , or have only done it
It one way and I say go for it and do as thou will.
Thanks.