grouper52
Masterpiece
I believe the exuberance displayed in their mission statement was simply used to create a buzz in the bonsai world. A refreshing spark to promote the "new movement to raise aesthetic appreciation...". If taken in certain context, as you have demonstrated, it does convey a sense of irony between something new (America's movement) and something old (traditional Japanese). While the overall description could have been a little less dramatic, I am glad they are at least putting forth an effort to improve the bonsai "scene" in America. I think the delay is a blessing in disguise, as it allows the creators to gather more input from the bonsai community. I'm sure Ryan and Michael would be eager to hear why you would not enter and what they can do to attract more artists/enthusiasts. That would be key for a successful inaugural show.
Thanks for your thoughtful post.
0ne thing about the emphasis for this contest is indeed captured in your choice of the word "scene". I believe there are many that hope to organize and consolidate American bonsai into a quasi-cult-like "scene" around a select few "masters" or "gurus", who have been trained in the correct view of reality by their Asian "masters/gurus". I've had intimate experience with Asian religious cults that have gravitated to the States over the past 50 years, and I have no interest in seeing American bonsai devolve into those sorts of shenanigans. Why must there be a bonsai "scene" at all? Why the need for a "scene"? What's the thinking?
I would not enter this competition for a number of the general points I have mentioned above, but here are some specific points to illustrate further.
I have no interest in accent plants or accent stones or such contrived nonsense to make a tree look authentically presentable. Trees easily stand - or fall - on their own merits, IMO.
The unnecessary requirement about moss is, again, contrived. Why must there be moss? And yet, even that moss must - I am certain - conform to Japanese traditions. In the Northwest, many of us just let varieties of local or invading species set up shop in our pots, and it often creates a gorgeous addition to the overall presentation of the tree. Such displays would be dismissed out of hand by this jury.
The requirements for pots and stands and wooden slabs and such will likewise carry the tacit assumption that the jury will pick only ones that their teachers would have approved of. I suppose, as "Fine Art", such a frame or pedestal is required, but again, I question the need to "elevate" bonsai to a "Fine Art". The motives of those who want to do so speak volumes to a shrink like myself.
The Japanese aesthetic is nothing else if not "refined," and even an occasional exuberance must be significantly restrained. The American psyche has little need for or interest in such. As Dan said, looking at the spectacular tree he would want to submit, "This is a fantastic tree! There probably aren't more than a handful of trees in whole country that are this exciting, exuding this much potential and energy. And it would never be selected."
Just to build on Dan's ideas, he has often said that the panel of judges at any bonsai competition should include at least one person who knew nothing at all about bonsai - someone picked off the street and asked to rank trees according to how much they liked them. The results, in his opinion, would be markedly different than they are now, and might result in a new energy, a very American energy, finally finding its way into the hobby.
I think he has a point. We are not Japanese. It would be an arguable point to suggest that those who are not at ease in their own culture here would probably do better to simply go live and practice bonsai over there. I do not believe Americans need to be "fundamentally transformed" in any way, nor their budding young American style of bonsai channeled into some foreign mold.
/rant/