Talent v. Technique

Right Attila, I agree and was going to write on about comparing master artist to one another is blasphemy and those that have to resort in doing so might be missing the whole point of art.. but I ran out of steam. For example comparing Walter to Kimaru is kinda dumb, they both have mastered bonsai yet their art looks and means nothing alike.
 
Quote:

'Greatness is more than potential. It is the execution of that potential. Beyond the raw talent. You need the appropriate training. You need the discipline. You need the inspiration. You need the drive.'
Eric A. Burns

Chris,even if you have doubts,the no-talent police will not arrest you..:D

-dorothy

Talent is not enough.Not for the artistic bonsai,as I understand the thread was about the relationship of art and talent and the revelation of the last.
The quote was to express the neccessity for nurturing the talent.Otherwise such talent will get unnoticed and irrelevant.

I noticed the term 'to inherit' in connection with talent.Yes,of course it is some kind of inheritance,otherwise everyone would be talented or nobody would be at all.
However rather then saying we do inherit talent,I would say we inherit a set of genes that may or may not set limits on our potential.Genes may predispose us to develop in a certain way or to learn certain things more easily than others,but what we ultimately become is the result of the interplay between our genetics and our experiences,environment,exposure etc..Twins (identical)for example can have the same genes or genotype,but they may end up with different personalities,likes,dislikes and thus talent due to different environmental influences.

In a prior post I suggested to visualize 5 people who are trying to learn bonsai,they all start at the same time.One is talented,one is gifted,three are average (for simplicity I did not standardize 'average').

What might happen?This is only hypothetical and without any evaluation.

The talented one and the gifted one will have a h e a d s t a r t and just be more advanced in the ability to learn and focus,applying techniques etc. in comparison to the"average" 3 people.However,if the other 3 people continue to learn consistently,they will eventually develop skill and catch up with the talented person.The 3"average" students will be able to create decent bonsai
and enjoy their hobby.
The talented one will be more advanced due the"extra mile" he/she is going regarding the education,the time spent,the drive to focus,the practitioning and will consistently apply the gained knowledge.This person will successfull (intellectually?)apply aesthetical elements in bonsai design.People will repeatedly t e l l this person,how talented he/she is.There might be different opinions though.
The gifted bonsaist is more than talented.The gifted bonsaist is the artist who moves the mass,who introduces avantgarde,who defines character and soul.There is absolutely no negotiation upon talent in connection with such a person.Whether a talented person will be able to catch up with a gifted"artist" depends on an array of conditions reaching from genetics to environmental influences and the pure luck to be at the right location at the right time.;)

Tomatoes please..:p

-dorothy
 
I don't believe in just sitting back and saying "I don't have talent, so I will just sit back and do nothing about it". That's a lame excuse. I believe in "if there is a will, there is a way". I believe that the mind has much more untapped power then what most people believe.

There is proof that even the aging process (which is believed to be genetically programmed) can be reversed to a certain extent, using your mind's power. There is also proof that even born abilities such as hearing, smelling, vision, can be improved, using the mind's power. What we were born with, is just a small part of what we are capable of, if we have the will and desire.

Thank you!

My point persactly!

Remind me I owe you the beverage of your choice sometime during the convention. We have a lot of catching up to do, it will be almost six months since we last saw each other.

I found this post on another forum. I found the words exchanged almost eerie, coming to fruition nearly three years later....

"A completely neutral remark meant solely to voice my own personal thoughts and not to provoke or discourage any discussion.

Al, like a few others here, is very talented, not only in bonsai but in woodworking. His tutorials on making stands and displays are truly remarkable and has added to the value of this forum greatly. He is not Andy, never will be. He is Al, sometimes a little grumpy and sometimes a little overzealous in making a point, but very talented never-the-less. He could call me the biggest no talented idiot he has ever has the misfortune to exchange words with and I would still learn from him. (After all he just may be right.)
Ron is another of the very talented people here. His bonsai are impressive, no matter what direction they are going in or how much work, if any, is left to do on them. He has been generous in sharing his wealth of knowledge and is for the most part always polite. This forum is also richer because of him.

It has been my experience in management that whenever you get two greatly talented people together, there will be clashes, some minor, some major. Call it the alpha male syndrome if you will, it happens and there's nothing that can be done about it except to set the guidelines and let nature take it's course.

I can count on my fingers the number of people here who have influenced me, who have made me think, who have proved their knowledge beyond a doubt, who have earned my respect. This was done not with pictures but with the advice that was given to others and myself and the non condescending tone that came with it.

Anyone can be an arrogant rear end, the man with true knowledge will treat a person with respect, deserving or not.

Vir sapit qui pauca loquitur

Will

(thanks officer)"



What I take from this paragraph from Oct. of 2004 is that while Will Heath was new to bonsai and discussion forums in general, he looked at me with someone with considerable skill. He considered me talented. Not talented that it was something I was born with, just more skilled than he at the time. Anyone that looks at anyone that has far superior skills than they themselves possess will consider that person as talented. In my book, superior skill means talent. My wife thinks the girl that paints her nails with an airbrush is talented because she could not possibly do it. If I were to buy my wife an airbrush kit and force her to practise four hours a day seven days a week, I am sure that the 14 year old neighbor girl will think my wife is talented.

As we move up the bonsai skills ladder at differing rates of speed, those that were talented yesterday may not seem so talented tomorrow. A person studying, and practising may eclipse a teacher in a year.

I love Mike Page's signature:
Two a novice I'm a master, but
To a master I'm a novice.

That signature says it all. The word "talent" as a label is only used by someone that does not possess the same skills as the person being observed. We don't really know if they are skilled, just talented. I believe that being skilled is far superior to being talented. I also truely believe that artistic bonsai can come from someone that is not talented, just very skilled. So skilled that they are percieved as having talent.

I been doing bonsai for 24 years, but I have only really grasped it in the last 6 years. That is when the light bulb sputtered on.

Kind of puts a spin on the whole Walter Pall craft versus art deal doesn't it?

Best regards, Al
 
Last edited:
Thanks Al, we will definitely have some drinks. Last time I saw you, you were in and out pretty fast, not much time for anything else.

Dorothy,
You've made some great points. I could hardly disagree with what you've said, at all.
 
I personally would like to thank all those who responded to this thread, the ideas, beliefs, and opinions make for good reading and they all helped me tremendously with the article I am writing. It is an asset to be able to read the arguments before I post my own beliefs and they will no doubt help me solidify the conclusions I publish.

There were some comments that I seen posted over the last few hours I would like to respond to, please forgive me for not going to in-depth with my replies. I'll read back though the last couple pages and quote the comments that sparked an interest so that my responses can be applied separately to avoid confusion.



Will
 
Dictionaries are not arbiters of meaning, they are descriptive of common usage of words and concepts. As such the definitions change over time, and the best dictionaries provide a history of those usages.

The thing about definitions, though, is that they need to be agreed upon for a common debate. If your definition of talent is diametrically opposed to mine, we may think we disagree but be saying exactly the same thing, or vice versa!


Definitely agree. To be able to play the game, first we need to agree on the rules.


In order to intelligently discuss talent, skill, or technique, we need to understand what exactly we are discussing. As Attila pointed out, we need to agree upon the rules.

While some may state that dictionaries are not arbiters of meaning, they are in fact the foundation that the usage of the English language is based on. Used as a calibration weight (if you will), they assure that all points of reference are the same. No logical discussion of talent can be had if everyone has a different definition of what talent is. There is no need to define talent, this has already been done and the definition has remained unchanged for centuries. All definitions of talent, from the earliest thoughts on the subject, right up to modern day reference books state that talent in non-hereditary and that it is natural, not acquired. This is the foundation or stone such discussion should be built on and not on the foundations of sand some have laid attempting to redefine talent to fit their own belief.

If we are to make up definitions then we might as well claim that talent is bestowed upon only those with an even number of eyelashes by a slightly overweight fairy from Wales who throws blueberry pudding on the unsuspecting who then suddenly find themselves flowing with talent. This claim would have as much supporting evidence as any others that go against time honored definitions.



Will
 
Will, Rather than beating the dictionary to death, I would rather read how you feel about the subject from your heart. Everyone else has poured their heart and soul into their replies, while you keep trying to force down our throat that talent is is undisputable if you have it.

That is not really important to this discussion. I want to know how you feel about working with a master, might one become talented. How do you feel about that. You glossed over my remarks about Ryan Neil and his apprenticeship with Kimura. Do you really feel that he will not be talented when he comes home if he did not have talent before?

I understand you have an agenda with this discussion because you are working on something not from this forum, but I would hope that you could give us a little more than definitions from a dictionary. Anyone can read that, and it means so little in the big picture of bonsai.

You once said that I was talented, in bonsai as well as woodworking. Many miles of water have passed under that bridge since then. Has your perception changed? If it has, have personel differences made that apparent. Do you feel that your talent has increased and therefore you have reached a point that you feel you are on an even basis and so now my abilities seem more craft based? Have you reached a point in your endeavor in which your talent has changed so much that you feel that bonsai forums are meaningless and have reached an entertainment stage?

I have many opinions on these and more. If you can say yes to any of these then it is apparent that talent is a moving target. It can change. If it does that Irene might not be so far off the mark.

Many a mystery movie and mystery novel have been based on a surgeon losing his touch. The talent is gone. It seems to me that if one can lose it, one can gain it.

Much to think about here, I hope to read many answers to this paradox here or elsewhere. I only hope you do me the service to at least answer a few.

Thanks, Al
 
I found this post on another forum. I found the words exchanged almost eerie, coming to fruition nearly three years later....

[snip]

What I take from this paragraph from Oct. of 2004 is that while Will Heath was new to bonsai and discussion forums in general, he looked at me with someone with considerable skill. He considered me talented. Not talented that it was something I was born with, just more skilled than he at the time. Anyone that looks at anyone that has far superior skills than they themselves possess will consider that person as talented. In my book, superior skill means talent. My wife thinks the girl that paints her nails with an airbrush is talented because she could not possibly do it. If I were to buy my wife an airbrush kit and force her to practise four hours a day seven days a week, I am sure that the 14 year old neighbor girl will think my wife is talented.

As we move up the bonsai skills ladder at differing rates of speed, those that were talented yesterday may not seem so talented tomorrow. A person studying, and practising may eclipse a teacher in a year.

[snip]

I been doing bonsai for 24 years, but I have only really grasped it in the last 6 years. That is when the light bulb sputtered on.

Wow 24 years in bonsai Al? That's a long time by anyone's standards.

I have been doing bonsai for three years. Over the course of that three years, I have learned quite a bit and like in all things, as knowledge was gained my worldview changed as well. I used to collect sticks, but as my knowledge grew I now collect much better stock. I used to buy cheap pots, but as my knowledge grew I now buy the best pots I can and have acquired a nice collection of Tokoname pots which I once thought were extremely overpriced. I used to look for cheaper alternatives for soil components, but as my knowledge grew I began using the best I could find. I once thought everyone with a better bonsai than I had were extremely talented, but as my knowledge grew I realized what real talent was and sought out those individuals as mentors and for inspiration.

When I first started out in sales I thought a co-worker was the best salesman in the world, it seemed like all he had to do was smile and the deal was closed, he made it look effortless. A few years later I caught myself wondering how he ever managed to impress me so much, my numbers by then doubled his on a regular basis and my average gross was triple. What happened? What happened was I was viewing him at a different level, I was no longer the wide eyed, green behind the ears, Jerry Lewis I was before and my vision was no longer clouded with inexperience. this happens to us all, we have all experienced it.

I still think you are very skilled at making stands, so much so that I was instrumental in launching your gallery of stands at AoB as well as your profile there highlighting your stands. In fact AoB makes it a point to feature only talented artists, the galleries and profiles are invite only to assure this. Have we slipped from time to time? Possibly, but those who some may say are not talented certainly have a high amount of skill.

Skill can produce respectable bonsai that are the exact sum of their parts.

Talent produces bonsai that are more than the sum of their parts.

There are people alive today that can reproduce every brush stroke Monet ever used, they can tell you which direction he preferred to draw the brush, how much pressure he applied, and what types of brushes he used. There are some people that can reproduce his work so well that unless you have a trained eye, you would never know the difference. This is acquired skill. This is learned technique.

These people have not produced great art even though they can do everything Monet could do. Even though they most likely know more about Monet's style of painting than he did. Why? They lack what Monet had, they lack the talent.

By the way, I am flattered you remembered that old post, thanks for sharing it.


Will
 
When I first started out in sales I thought a co-worker was the best salesman in the world, it seemed like all he had to do was smile and the deal was closed, he made it look effortless. A few years later I caught myself wondering how he ever managed to impress me so much, my numbers by then doubled his on a regular basis and my average gross was triple. What happened? What happened was I was viewing him at a different level, I was no longer the wide eyed, green behind the ears, Jerry Lewis I was before and my vision was no longer clouded with inexperience. this happens to us all, we have all experienced it.

I still think you are very skilled at making stands, so much so that I was instrumental in launching your gallery of stands at AoB as well as your profile there highlighting your stands.
Talent produces bonsai that are more than the sum of their parts.

Will


So... I am not so sure how I am supposed to take the first quote. Are you saying that as your ability increased you reached and even eclipsed your collegue meaning that you were talented and he less so? While thinking with your inexperienced entry to sales that you were the less talented one?

I notice now that I am only "skilled" at making bonsai stands and no longer talented. What has changed? If I was talented before and you can't learn talent or lose it, you are born with it, how can you change your perception? You can't unless of course you feel exactly as I do. Perception of talent will change as one's experience widens.

I will except your compliment on the stands though, you are right I am highly skilled. The trees are doing pretty good too. 2/zip

Cheers, Al
 
Will, Rather than beating the dictionary to death, I would rather read how you feel about the subject from your heart. Everyone else has poured their heart and soul into their replies, while you keep trying to force down our throat that talent is is undisputable if you have it.

That is not really important to this discussion.
I disagree Al, knowing what one is talking about is always important to a discussion.

You glossed over my remarks about Ryan Neil and his apprenticeship with Kimura. Do you really feel that he will not be talented when he comes home if he did not have talent before?
Yes. If (and do mean if) he was not talented when he left, he will not be talented when he returns. He will however, no doubt return with a vast collection of skills, with a vast amount of practice on techniques, as well as a valuable knowledge base to draw from. These alone will help him to create some very good bonsai.


You once said that I was talented, in bonsai as well as woodworking. Many miles of water have passed under that bridge since then. Has your perception changed? If it has, have personel differences made that apparent. Do you feel that your talent has increased and therefore you have reached a point that you feel you are on an even basis and so now my abilities seem more craft based? Have you reached a point in your endeavor in which your talent has changed so much that you feel that bonsai forums are meaningless and have reached an entertainment stage?
Al, forums have their purpose, this purpose is different to each of us. The important thing to remember about forums is that they only represent a very small percentage of bonsaists. Some bonsai forums are useless to me only because they do not offer what I seek, not to say that others can't find something useful in them. What I was seeking did not exist on the forums before, it does now.

As Attila pointed out, there are many talents that can help a person create artistic bonsai, just as in any other art form. What amount of what talent is impossible to determine now. What is obvious is that something separates the truly great bonsai, those that are art, from the rest. Experience and time spent doing bonsai means nothing, these measurements are useless. Some people study under great masters and have for many years and still have not produced great bonsai. Other people produce great bonsai in shorter time frames with lessor instruction. Which person has talent? They both have skills, they both have the technique down, but only one produces great bonsai, and by great I mean those bonsai that take your breath away, those that are more than the sum of their parts.

It could be they both have talent, one has harnessed it, the other has not. The other may one day, he may not. But what is important is that one is creating art.

Many a mystery movie and mystery novel have been based on a surgeon losing his touch. The talent is gone. It seems to me that if one can lose it, one can gain it.
This assumes that all surgeons are talented and that assumption is false. Some surgeons may be talented, some may just be very good at applying the techniques they learned.

I knew a pool player once that was very talented, he picked up a stick and played well in his basement on the pool table there at 5 years old, at 7 he was winning tournaments. At 16 years old he broke his arm in a skiing accident and his pool game went south, he could still play, but the naturalness was gone, he had to think about it and for some reason that ruined his game. Did he lose his talent? No, he lost his ability to use it. Big difference.

Mental blocks, injuries, or other outside influences could well account for a surgeon losing his ability to apply technique or use talent. It does not mean the talent is lost, it only means that the ability to use it is lost.

Think writers block..a writer can't write, they are stuck, mentally frozen. The writer has used his talent numerous times, he just can't access it at the moment. The talent hasn't gone, it is just not accessible now.....

and so on...


Will
 
Last edited:
Here is a simple equation for you:

________=99% PERSPIRATION AND 1% INSPIRATION


You can fill in the blank with Art, Architecture or Dance; any will do. The perspiration part can be thought of as Skill. The inspiration part can be thought of as Talent. Good night;)
 
ugh boy....


Well I must go to sleep now to get ready and pick out trees for exhibit at the shohin convention and the GSBF convention. I will be at the Redwood Bonsai Societies exhibit in Santa Rosa Cal. tomorrow. No doubt I will run into many "talented" people there.

Good posting, Al
 
There is no doubt in my mind that there is such a thing as talent; to assign the work of Mozart or Beethoven to the realm of being simply the results of hard work is ignorant. You can site hard work but true talent drives a person to hard work, it tends to be a compulsion for those who have it in the extreme. Just to clear things up, Mozart was not a savant. As to the argument of being born into a musical family; there is no guarantee that the progeny will be musically gifted.

Good examples used here. Based on Al's beliefs, anyone can be the next Mozart or Beethoven if they just practice long and hard enough. The fact is that there are pianists in the world now who can play every note ever written by these two musicians quite well with technically flawless precision. Well enough to earn a living at it, well enough to have gain some fame and recognition for it, well enough to even be called talented. I would certainly say they have practiced and worked hard.

So where are their original pieces? Why are they not being hailed as being gifted and as being composers on the level of Mozart or Beethoven? Because they have all the skills and all the techniques of these great men, they just don't have the talent these men did.

Orli Shaham, on the other hand, may be a different story, having received her first scholarship for musical study from the America-Israel Cultural Foundation at the age of five, and presently acclaimed for her precision and technique, she is still young enough to do great things. I expect to see a lot out of her in the future, but that is another story.


Will

Daily trivia: Both Mozart and Beethoven first musical instructors were their fathers.
 
Last edited:
To be clear, the conclusion drawn was NOT that talent is inborn. The conclusion drawn was that most people are confused by the nuances of skill and talent. BOLDLY unsupported

I think the posts here in this thread supports the conclusion very well.



Will
 
Last edited:
There is no doubt in my mind that there is such a thing as talent; to assign the work of Mozart or Beethoven to the realm of being simply the results of hard work is ignorant. You can site hard work but true talent drives a person to hard work, it tends to be a compulsion for those who have it in the extreme. Just to clear things up, Mozart was not a savant. As to the argument of being born into a musical family; there is no guarantee that the progeny will be musically gifted.

Just to clarify, I have never said that their work is simply the results of hard work. What I'm saying is that there might be a phenomenon such as talent, but I don't believe it's in the genes.
 
Just to clarify, I have never said that their work is simply the results of hard work. What I'm saying is that there might be a phenomenon such as talent, but I don't believe it's in the genes.

I agree, it is not hereditary.


Will
 
Well I must go to sleep now to get ready and pick out trees for exhibit at the shohin convention and the GSBF convention. I will be at the Redwood Bonsai Societies exhibit in Santa Rosa Cal. tomorrow. No doubt I will run into many "talented" people there.

Don't worry Al, it's not contagious. ;)


Have fun,


Will
 
Back
Top Bottom